Easy PV
Midsummer
Design & simulation · Web
Comparison
20 differences · 14 identical
The differences that matter most
They differ most on price published. Aurora Solar publishes USD 159; PV*SOL premium publishes EUR 845.
We do not name a winner. Below are 20 differences drawn from the same sourced dataset that powers both product pages.
Verified against the vendor’s own pages.
Both use the same pricing model, so the figures below are directly comparable.
Aurora Solar
USD 159
159 USD per user/month
Per seat
1 seat included
50 projects
PV*SOL premium
EUR 845
845 EUR per named user/year, plus VAT
Per seat
Prices are shown exactly as each vendor writes them and are never converted between currencies.
20 differences, ordered by how much they are likely to matter — pricing transparency first, then capabilities the vendor explicitly confirms or denies.
| Capability | Aurora Solar | PV*SOL premium |
|---|---|---|
| Solar design & simulation | ||
| Named weather / irradiance data source | — Not found | advanced Verified |
| Single-line diagram | — Not found | Advanced Verified |
| CAD export (DXF/DWG) | — Not found | Yes Vendor claim |
| Ground-mount / tracker layout | — Not applicable | — Not found |
| AI & automation | ||
| AI design assistance | vendor-claimed Verified | — Could not read |
| Integrations & extensibility | ||
| Named, documented integrations | 7 Verified | 20 Verified |
| Public API | Advanced Verified | Basic Vendor claim |
| Platform & deployment | ||
| Delivery model | hybrid Verified | software Verified |
| Desktop OS support | — Could not read | Windows 10/11 64-bit; .NET 4.8; internet required Verified |
| Web application | Yes Verified | No Verified |
| Pricing & commercial terms | ||
| Price published | Partial Verified | Published Verified |
| Free tier | Not offered Verified | free-trial Verified |
| Entry price | 159 USD per user/month Verified | 845 EUR per named user/year, plus VAT Verified |
| Currency | USD Verified | EUR Verified |
| Project / design cap | 50 Verified | — Could not read |
| Seat cap | 1 Verified | — Could not read |
| Market fit & availability | ||
| C&I | No Verified | Yes Verified |
| Geographic availability | US; CA; EU Verified | DE; EU; global Verified |
| Jurisdictional compliance capability | us-nec Verified | — Could not read |
| Target buyer | small-installer; sales-org Verified | engineering-firm; small-installer Verified |
Scroll the table sideways to see both products. The capability column stays in place.
Framed as requirements, not a verdict. Both descriptions come from the same data.
For residential installers and dealer/sales organisations who need design accuracy and a proposal in the same tool, on a per-seat subscription. Not for utility-scale or large C&I work — the vendor's own navigation routes "Commercial" to a different product (HelioScope), and the Aurora plan tables cap Basic/Premium at 1 user and 50 projects/month.
Full Aurora Solar profileFor European installers, planners, roofers and energy consultants doing residential and commercial rooftop work where realistic 3D shading, battery/EV/heat-pump self-consumption and a presentable customer report matter. Not for utility-scale ground-mount engineering (the published ceiling is 7,500 mounted / 10,000 roof-parallel modules), not for macOS, and not for anyone needing a cloud or multi-user workspace.
Full PV*SOL premium profileMidsummer
Design & simulation · Web
SolarEdge Technologies
Design & simulation · Web
National Laboratory of the Rockies (NLR) — formerly the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)
Design & simulation · Desktop
They differ most on price published. In total we recorded 20 verified differences and 14 points where they are the same.
Both are priced per seat. Aurora Solar: USD 159. PV*SOL premium: EUR 845.
We do not name a winner. Both are described from the same verified data, and which suits you depends on your requirements — the differences above are the facts; the choice is yours.
Last verified
Vendors change pricing and features without notice. Check the vendor’s own page before deciding.
This comparison is generated from the feature database, not written by hand. A pair is only published when the data holds at least five stateable differences — which is why 281 candidate pairs were refused. How comparisons are built