SolarSoftwares
Find Software →

100 products researched 2,422 sourced facts Verified September 2026 Methodology

Comparison

Enact vs PV*SOL premium

28 differences · 10 identical

EnactEnact Systems Inc.
Entry price
USD 279
Charged
Per seat
Free tier or trial
No free tier or trial
Named integrations
1
Verified data points
11
PV*SOL premiumValentin Software GmbH
Entry price
EUR 845
Charged
Per seat
Free tier or trial
Free trial
Named integrations
20
Verified data points
11

The differences that matter most

  • Price published Partial Published
  • Free tier Not offered free-trial
  • Entry price 279 USD per month billed annually 845 EUR per named user/year, plus VAT

All 28 differences ↓

Enact or PV*SOL premium?

They differ most on price published. Enact publishes USD 279; PV*SOL premium publishes EUR 845.

We do not name a winner. Below are 28 differences drawn from the same sourced dataset that powers both product pages.

Verified against the vendor’s own pages.

Pricing

Both use the same pricing model, so the figures below are directly comparable.

Enact

USD 279

279 USD per month billed annually

Per seat

2 seats included

10 projects

PV*SOL premium

EUR 845

845 EUR per named user/year, plus VAT

Per seat

Prices are shown exactly as each vendor writes them and are never converted between currencies.

Where they differ

28 differences, ordered by how much they are likely to matter — pricing transparency first, then capabilities the vendor explicitly confirms or denies.

Legend Verified Vendor claim Not offered Not found Could not read
Differences between Enact and PV*SOL premium
Capability Enact PV*SOL premium
Solar design & simulation
Ground-mount / tracker layout Advanced Verified — Not found
Loss and uncertainty modelling (P50/P90) Advanced Verified — Not found
Named weather / irradiance data source — Not found advanced Verified
3D roof and obstruction model Advanced Verified — Could not read
Annual energy yield simulation Basic Vendor claim Advanced Verified
Automatic module layout Basic Vendor claim Advanced Verified
Bankable / IE-accepted simulation report — Not found Basic Vendor claim
CAD export (DXF/DWG) Yes Verified Yes Vendor claim
Inverter sizing — Could not read Advanced Verified
On-site capture (drone / photogrammetry) — Not found — Could not read
Shading analysis — Could not read Advanced Verified
String sizing / stringing Advanced Verified — Could not read
Monitoring & operations
Production monitoring Advanced Verified — Could not read
AI & automation
AI defect / anomaly detection vendor-claimed Verified — Could not read
Integrations & extensibility
Named, documented integrations 1 Verified 20 Verified
Platform prerequisite AutoCAD (PVCAD plug-in tier) — or bundled at +$66/month Verified — Could not read
Platform & deployment
Delivery model hybrid Verified software Verified
Desktop OS support — Could not read Windows 10/11 64-bit; .NET 4.8; internet required Verified
Web application Yes Verified No Verified
Pricing & commercial terms
Price published Partial Verified Published Verified
Free tier Not offered Verified free-trial Verified
Entry price 279 USD per month billed annually Verified 845 EUR per named user/year, plus VAT Verified
Currency USD Verified EUR Verified
Project / design cap 10 Verified — Could not read
Seat cap 2 Verified — Could not read
Market fit & availability
Geographic availability US; global Verified DE; EU; global Verified
Target buyer — Could not read engineering-firm; small-installer Verified
Utility-scale Yes Verified No Verified

Scroll the table sideways to see both products. The capability column stays in place.

Where they are the same 10 data points
  • Pricing model
  • Single-line diagram
  • Remote site capture from imagery
  • Battery sizing and modelling
  • ROI / payback calculation
  • Public API
  • Product status
  • C&I
  • Residential
  • Proposal document generation

Which might suit you

Framed as requirements, not a verdict. Both descriptions come from the same data.

Consider Enact if…

  • AI-assisted workflows matter to you
  • you work at utility scale
  • your work is mostly residential

Installers who want one vendor for sales design, permit-grade engineering and post-install monitoring, and who will pay for those as three separate line items. It is not a single unified product: the "end-to-end platform" announced in January 2026 is, as sold on 2026-09-25, three priced modules — one of which still lives on a separate domain under a separate brand, with its own pricing pages that disagree with Enact's. [✓ https://enact.solar/providers/provider-pricing/ · 2026-09-25]

Full Enact profile

Consider PV*SOL premium if…

  • you need a price you can plan against before talking to sales
  • you need it to connect to tools you already run (20 named)
  • you are comfortable with desktop software and its constraints
  • your work is mostly residential

For European installers, planners, roofers and energy consultants doing residential and commercial rooftop work where realistic 3D shading, battery/EV/heat-pump self-consumption and a presentable customer report matter. Not for utility-scale ground-mount engineering (the published ceiling is 7,500 mounted / 10,000 roof-parallel modules), not for macOS, and not for anyone needing a cloud or multi-user workspace.

Full PV*SOL premium profile

Related comparisons

Other options in design & simulation

Frequently asked

What is the main difference between Enact and PV*SOL premium?

They differ most on price published. In total we recorded 28 verified differences and 10 points where they are the same.

Which costs more, Enact or PV*SOL premium?

Both are priced per seat. Enact: USD 279. PV*SOL premium: EUR 845.

Is Enact or PV*SOL premium better?

We do not name a winner. Both are described from the same verified data, and which suits you depends on your requirements — the differences above are the facts; the choice is yours.

Last verified

Vendors change pricing and features without notice. Check the vendor’s own page before deciding.

This comparison is generated from the feature database, not written by hand. A pair is only published when the data holds at least five stateable differences — which is why 281 candidate pairs were refused. How comparisons are built