SolarSoftwares
Find Software →

100 products researched 2,422 sourced facts Verified September 2026 Methodology

Comparison

Reslink Energy vs Solargis Evaluate

25 differences · 10 identical

Reslink EnergyReslink Technologies Private Limited
Entry price
USD 2000
Charged
Capacity tiered
Free tier or trial
Demo only, no trial
Named integrations
0
Verified data points
9
Solargis EvaluateSolargis
Entry price
EUR 12000
Charged
Per seat
Free tier or trial
No free tier or trial
Named integrations
0
Verified data points
7

The differences that matter most

  • Pricing model capacity-tiered per-seat
  • Free tier demo-only Not offered
  • Entry price 2000 USD per year 12000 EUR subscription

All 25 differences ↓

Reslink Energy or Solargis Evaluate?

They differ most on pricing model. Reslink Energy publishes USD 2000; Solargis Evaluate publishes EUR 12000. They use different pricing models, so those figures do not compare directly.

We do not name a winner. Below are 25 differences drawn from the same sourced dataset that powers both product pages.

Verified against the vendor’s own pages.

Pricing

These cannot be compared on a single number

Reslink Energy is priced capacity-tiered and Solargis Evaluate is priced per-seat. These are different pricing models, so a single side-by-side figure would be misleading. Each is shown as its vendor states it.

Reslink Energy

USD 2000

2000 USD per year

Capacity tiered

Size ceiling: 100 kW / 500 kW / 5 MW / 100 MW

Solargis Evaluate

EUR 12000

12000 EUR subscription

Per seat

60 projects

Prices are shown exactly as each vendor writes them and are never converted between currencies.

Where they differ

25 differences, ordered by how much they are likely to matter — pricing transparency first, then capabilities the vendor explicitly confirms or denies.

Legend Verified Vendor claim Not offered Not found Could not read
Differences between Reslink Energy and Solargis Evaluate
Capability Reslink Energy Solargis Evaluate
Solar design & simulation
Battery sizing and modelling Advanced Verified — Not found
Named weather / irradiance data source — Not found advanced Verified
Single-line diagram Advanced Verified — Not found
3D roof and obstruction model Advanced Verified — Could not read
Annual energy yield simulation Basic Vendor claim Advanced Verified
CAD export (DXF/DWG) Yes Vendor claim — Not found
Loss and uncertainty modelling (P50/P90) Advanced Verified Basic Verified
On-site capture (drone / photogrammetry) — Not found — Could not read
Shading analysis — Could not read Advanced Verified
String sizing / stringing Advanced Verified — Could not read
Proposals & sales
E-signature — Could not read — Not found
Proposal document generation Advanced Verified — Could not read
Estimation & financial modelling
ROI / payback calculation Basic Vendor claim — Not found
Reporting, data & BI
Report / deliverable export — Could not read Advanced Verified
Platform & deployment
Delivery model software Verified hybrid Verified
Pricing & commercial terms
Pricing model capacity-tiered Verified per-seat Verified
Free tier demo-only Verified Not offered Verified
Entry price 2000 USD per year Verified 12000 EUR subscription Verified
Currency USD Verified EUR Verified
Project / design cap — Could not read 60 Verified
System size cap 100 kW / 500 kW / 5 MW / 100 MW Verified — Could not read
Market fit & availability
Geographic availability IN; global Verified global Verified
Residential Yes Verified No Verified
Target buyer small-installer; enterprise-epc Verified developer Verified
Utility-scale No Verified Yes Verified

Scroll the table sideways to see both products. The capability column stays in place.

Where they are the same 10 data points
  • Price published
  • Automatic module layout
  • Ground-mount / tracker layout
  • Remote site capture from imagery
  • Bankable / IE-accepted simulation report
  • Public API
  • Named, documented integrations
  • Product status
  • C&I
  • Web application

Which might suit you

Framed as requirements, not a verdict. Both descriptions come from the same data.

Consider Reslink Energy if…

  • you need a price you can plan against before talking to sales
  • your systems fit within 100 kW / 500 kW / 5 MW / 100 MW
  • your work is mostly residential

Indian rooftop and C&I EPCs whose sales reps carry a phone rather than a laptop and who want the design, BOM and proposal produced on the roof. It is not for anyone who needs a price they can rely on before they call sales: the same site publishes four mutually incompatible price schedules, in two currencies, on two billing periods, with two different sets of plan names — and a fifth figure appears on its Capterra listing. [✓ https://www.reslink.org/pricing/ · 2026-09-25]

Full Reslink Energy profile

Consider Solargis Evaluate if…

  • you need a price you can plan against before talking to sales
  • you work at utility scale

For utility-scale developers, engineers and IEs who are already buying Solargis data and want the design and simulation layer on top of it, with reports investors accept. Not for residential or rooftop sales work, not for anyone needing CAD/construction deliverables, and not for small teams — the published entry subscription is €12,000 and the project allowance is 60 "Early Stage" projects.

Full Solargis Evaluate profile

Related comparisons

Other options in design & simulation

Frequently asked

What is the main difference between Reslink Energy and Solargis Evaluate?

They differ most on pricing model. In total we recorded 25 verified differences and 10 points where they are the same.

Which costs more, Reslink Energy or Solargis Evaluate?

Reslink Energy is priced capacity-tiered and Solargis Evaluate is priced per-seat. These are different pricing models, so a single side-by-side figure would be misleading. Each is shown as its vendor states it.

Is Reslink Energy or Solargis Evaluate better?

We do not name a winner. Both are described from the same verified data, and which suits you depends on your requirements — the differences above are the facts; the choice is yours.

Last verified

Vendors change pricing and features without notice. Check the vendor’s own page before deciding.

This comparison is generated from the feature database, not written by hand. A pair is only published when the data holds at least five stateable differences — which is why 281 candidate pairs were refused. How comparisons are built