SolarSoftwares
Find Software →

100 products researched 2,422 sourced facts Verified September 2026 Methodology

Comparison

Enact vs Solargis Evaluate

28 differences · 10 identical

EnactEnact Systems Inc.
Entry price
USD 279
Charged
Per seat
Free tier or trial
No free tier or trial
Named integrations
1
Verified data points
11
Solargis EvaluateSolargis
Entry price
EUR 12000
Charged
Per seat
Free tier or trial
No free tier or trial
Named integrations
0
Verified data points
7

The differences that matter most

  • Price published Partial Published
  • Entry price 279 USD per month billed annually 12000 EUR subscription
  • Battery sizing and modelling Advanced Not found

All 28 differences ↓

Enact or Solargis Evaluate?

They differ most on price published. Enact publishes USD 279; Solargis Evaluate publishes EUR 12000.

We do not name a winner. Below are 28 differences drawn from the same sourced dataset that powers both product pages.

Verified against the vendor’s own pages.

Pricing

Both use the same pricing model, so the figures below are directly comparable.

Enact

USD 279

279 USD per month billed annually

Per seat

2 seats included

10 projects

Solargis Evaluate

EUR 12000

12000 EUR subscription

Per seat

60 projects

Prices are shown exactly as each vendor writes them and are never converted between currencies.

Where they differ

28 differences, ordered by how much they are likely to matter — pricing transparency first, then capabilities the vendor explicitly confirms or denies.

Legend Verified Vendor claim Not offered Not found Could not read
Differences between Enact and Solargis Evaluate
Capability Enact Solargis Evaluate
Solar design & simulation
Battery sizing and modelling Advanced Verified — Not found
CAD export (DXF/DWG) Yes Verified — Not found
Named weather / irradiance data source — Not found advanced Verified
Single-line diagram Advanced Verified — Not found
3D roof and obstruction model Advanced Verified — Could not read
Annual energy yield simulation Basic Vendor claim Advanced Verified
Automatic module layout Basic Vendor claim Advanced Verified
Bankable / IE-accepted simulation report — Not found Basic Vendor claim
Loss and uncertainty modelling (P50/P90) Advanced Verified Basic Verified
On-site capture (drone / photogrammetry) — Not found — Could not read
Shading analysis — Could not read Advanced Verified
String sizing / stringing Advanced Verified — Could not read
Proposals & sales
E-signature — Could not read — Not found
Proposal document generation Advanced Verified — Could not read
Estimation & financial modelling
ROI / payback calculation Advanced Verified — Not found
Monitoring & operations
Production monitoring Advanced Verified — Could not read
Reporting, data & BI
Report / deliverable export — Could not read Advanced Verified
AI & automation
AI defect / anomaly detection vendor-claimed Verified — Could not read
Integrations & extensibility
Named, documented integrations 1 Verified 0 Verified
Platform prerequisite AutoCAD (PVCAD plug-in tier) — or bundled at +$66/month Verified — Could not read
Pricing & commercial terms
Price published Partial Verified Published Verified
Entry price 279 USD per month billed annually Verified 12000 EUR subscription Verified
Currency USD Verified EUR Verified
Project / design cap 10 Verified 60 Verified
Seat cap 2 Verified — Could not read
Market fit & availability
Geographic availability US; global Verified global Verified
Residential Yes Verified No Verified
Target buyer — Could not read developer Verified

Scroll the table sideways to see both products. The capability column stays in place.

Where they are the same 10 data points
  • Pricing model
  • Free tier
  • Ground-mount / tracker layout
  • Remote site capture from imagery
  • Public API
  • Product status
  • C&I
  • Utility-scale
  • Delivery model
  • Web application

Which might suit you

Framed as requirements, not a verdict. Both descriptions come from the same data.

Consider Enact if…

  • AI-assisted workflows matter to you
  • you work at utility scale
  • your work is mostly residential

Installers who want one vendor for sales design, permit-grade engineering and post-install monitoring, and who will pay for those as three separate line items. It is not a single unified product: the "end-to-end platform" announced in January 2026 is, as sold on 2026-09-25, three priced modules — one of which still lives on a separate domain under a separate brand, with its own pricing pages that disagree with Enact's. [✓ https://enact.solar/providers/provider-pricing/ · 2026-09-25]

Full Enact profile

Consider Solargis Evaluate if…

  • you need a price you can plan against before talking to sales
  • you work at utility scale

For utility-scale developers, engineers and IEs who are already buying Solargis data and want the design and simulation layer on top of it, with reports investors accept. Not for residential or rooftop sales work, not for anyone needing CAD/construction deliverables, and not for small teams — the published entry subscription is €12,000 and the project allowance is 60 "Early Stage" projects.

Full Solargis Evaluate profile

Related comparisons

Other options in design & simulation

Frequently asked

What is the main difference between Enact and Solargis Evaluate?

They differ most on price published. In total we recorded 28 verified differences and 10 points where they are the same.

Which costs more, Enact or Solargis Evaluate?

Both are priced per seat. Enact: USD 279. Solargis Evaluate: EUR 12000.

Is Enact or Solargis Evaluate better?

We do not name a winner. Both are described from the same verified data, and which suits you depends on your requirements — the differences above are the facts; the choice is yours.

Last verified

Vendors change pricing and features without notice. Check the vendor’s own page before deciding.

This comparison is generated from the feature database, not written by hand. A pair is only published when the data holds at least five stateable differences — which is why 281 candidate pairs were refused. How comparisons are built