SolarSoftwares
Find Software →

100 products researched 2,422 sourced facts Verified September 2026 Methodology

Comparison

Enact vs SolarEdge Designer

25 differences · 12 identical

EnactEnact Systems Inc.
Entry price
USD 279
Charged
Per seat
Free tier or trial
No free tier or trial
Named integrations
1
Verified data points
11
SolarEdge DesignerSolarEdge Technologies
Entry price
Free
Charged
Free
Free tier or trial
Free tier, no time limit
Named integrations
2
Verified data points
9

The differences that matter most

  • Price published Partial Published
  • Pricing model per-seat free
  • Free tier Not offered free-forever

All 25 differences ↓

Enact or SolarEdge Designer?

They differ most on price published. Enact publishes USD 279; SolarEdge Designer publishes Free. They use different pricing models, so those figures do not compare directly.

We do not name a winner. Below are 25 differences drawn from the same sourced dataset that powers both product pages.

Verified against the vendor’s own pages.

Pricing

These cannot be compared on a single number

Enact is priced per-seat and SolarEdge Designer is priced free. These are different pricing models, so a single side-by-side figure would be misleading. Each is shown as its vendor states it.

Enact

USD 279

279 USD per month billed annually

Per seat

2 seats included

10 projects

SolarEdge Designer

Free

0 USD no licence or subscription fees

Free

Prices are shown exactly as each vendor writes them and are never converted between currencies.

Where they differ

25 differences, ordered by how much they are likely to matter — pricing transparency first, then capabilities the vendor explicitly confirms or denies.

Legend Verified Vendor claim Not offered Not found Could not read
Differences between Enact and SolarEdge Designer
Capability Enact SolarEdge Designer
Solar design & simulation
Ground-mount / tracker layout Advanced Verified — Not found
Loss and uncertainty modelling (P50/P90) Advanced Verified — Not found
Single-line diagram Advanced Verified — Not found
3D roof and obstruction model Advanced Verified — Could not read
Annual energy yield simulation Basic Vendor claim Advanced Verified
Automatic module layout Basic Vendor claim Advanced Verified
Inverter sizing — Could not read Advanced Verified
On-site capture (drone / photogrammetry) — Not found — Could not read
Shading analysis — Could not read Advanced Verified
String sizing / stringing Advanced Verified — Could not read
Monitoring & operations
Production monitoring Advanced Verified — Could not read
AI & automation
AI defect / anomaly detection vendor-claimed Verified — Could not read
AI design assistance — Could not read vendor-claimed Verified
Integrations & extensibility
Named, documented integrations 1 Verified 2 Verified
Platform prerequisite AutoCAD (PVCAD plug-in tier) — or bundled at +$66/month Verified — Could not read
Public API Basic Vendor claim — Not found
Platform & deployment
Delivery model hybrid Verified software Verified
Pricing & commercial terms
Price published Partial Verified Published Verified
Pricing model per-seat Verified free Verified
Free tier Not offered Verified free-forever Verified
Entry price 279 USD per month billed annually Verified 0 USD no licence or subscription fees Verified
Project / design cap 10 Verified — Could not read
Seat cap 2 Verified — Could not read
Market fit & availability
Geographic availability US; global Verified global Verified
Utility-scale Yes Verified No Verified

Scroll the table sideways to see both products. The capability column stays in place.

Where they are the same 12 data points
  • Currency
  • CAD export (DXF/DWG)
  • Remote site capture from imagery
  • Battery sizing and modelling
  • Bankable / IE-accepted simulation report
  • Named weather / irradiance data source
  • ROI / payback calculation
  • Product status
  • C&I
  • Residential
  • Web application
  • Proposal document generation

Which might suit you

Framed as requirements, not a verdict. Both descriptions come from the same data.

Consider Enact if…

  • AI-assisted workflows matter to you
  • you work at utility scale
  • your work is mostly residential

Installers who want one vendor for sales design, permit-grade engineering and post-install monitoring, and who will pay for those as three separate line items. It is not a single unified product: the "end-to-end platform" announced in January 2026 is, as sold on 2026-09-25, three priced modules — one of which still lives on a separate domain under a separate brand, with its own pricing pages that disagree with Enact's. [✓ https://enact.solar/providers/provider-pricing/ · 2026-09-25]

Full Enact profile

Consider SolarEdge Designer if…

  • you need a price you can plan against before talking to sales
  • you want to start without a budget approval
  • AI-assisted workflows matter to you
  • your work is mostly residential

For installers designing SolarEdge systems who want design, compliance checking and a proposal at no cost, integrated with the SolarEdge Monitoring Platform. Not for vendor-neutral design work: the vendor's own copy scopes it to "all your SolarEdge systems" and to compliance with "the latest SolarEdge design rules". Any comparison page must state that the price is zero because the product sells inverters, not software.

Full SolarEdge Designer profile

Related comparisons

Other options in design & simulation

Frequently asked

What is the main difference between Enact and SolarEdge Designer?

They differ most on price published. In total we recorded 25 verified differences and 12 points where they are the same.

Which costs more, Enact or SolarEdge Designer?

Enact is priced per-seat and SolarEdge Designer is priced free. These are different pricing models, so a single side-by-side figure would be misleading. Each is shown as its vendor states it.

Is Enact or SolarEdge Designer better?

We do not name a winner. Both are described from the same verified data, and which suits you depends on your requirements — the differences above are the facts; the choice is yours.

Last verified

Vendors change pricing and features without notice. Check the vendor’s own page before deciding.

This comparison is generated from the feature database, not written by hand. A pair is only published when the data holds at least five stateable differences — which is why 281 candidate pairs were refused. How comparisons are built