SolarSoftwares
Find Software →

100 products researched 2,422 sourced facts Verified September 2026 Methodology

Comparison

Arka 360 vs Reslink Energy

14 differences · 19 identical

Arka 360Arka360
Entry price
USD 159
Charged
Per seat
Free tier or trial
No free tier or trial
Named integrations
2
Verified data points
11
Reslink EnergyReslink Technologies Private Limited
Entry price
USD 2000
Charged
Capacity tiered
Free tier or trial
Demo only, no trial
Named integrations
0
Verified data points
9

The differences that matter most

  • Pricing model per-seat capacity-tiered
  • Free tier Not offered demo-only
  • Entry price 159 USD per month (one of three conflicting figures) 2000 USD per year

All 14 differences ↓

Arka 360 or Reslink Energy?

They differ most on pricing model. Arka 360 publishes USD 159; Reslink Energy publishes USD 2000. They use different pricing models, so those figures do not compare directly.

We do not name a winner. Below are 14 differences drawn from the same sourced dataset that powers both product pages.

Verified against the vendor’s own pages.

Pricing

These cannot be compared on a single number

Arka 360 is priced per-seat and Reslink Energy is priced capacity-tiered. These are different pricing models, so a single side-by-side figure would be misleading. Each is shown as its vendor states it.

Arka 360

USD 159

159 USD per month (one of three conflicting figures)

Per seat

1 seat included

Reslink Energy

USD 2000

2000 USD per year

Capacity tiered

Size ceiling: 100 kW / 500 kW / 5 MW / 100 MW

Prices are shown exactly as each vendor writes them and are never converted between currencies.

Where they differ

14 differences, ordered by how much they are likely to matter — pricing transparency first, then capabilities the vendor explicitly confirms or denies.

Legend Verified Vendor claim Not offered Not found Could not read
Differences between Arka 360 and Reslink Energy
Capability Arka 360 Reslink Energy
Solar design & simulation
Annual energy yield simulation Advanced Verified Basic Vendor claim
CAD export (DXF/DWG) Yes Verified Yes Vendor claim
Ground-mount / tracker layout Basic Vendor claim Advanced Verified
Estimation & financial modelling
ROI / payback calculation Advanced Verified Basic Vendor claim
AI & automation
AI design assistance vendor-claimed Verified — Could not read
Integrations & extensibility
Named, documented integrations 2 Verified 0 Verified
Platform & deployment
Delivery model hybrid Verified software Verified
Pricing & commercial terms
Pricing model per-seat Verified capacity-tiered Verified
Free tier Not offered Verified demo-only Verified
Entry price 159 USD per month (one of three conflicting figures) Verified 2000 USD per year Verified
Seat cap 1 Verified — Could not read
System size cap — Could not read 100 kW / 500 kW / 5 MW / 100 MW Verified
Market fit & availability
Geographic availability US; IN; global Verified IN; global Verified
Target buyer solo-installer; small-installer Verified small-installer; enterprise-epc Verified

Scroll the table sideways to see both products. The capability column stays in place.

Where they are the same 19 data points
  • Currency
  • Price published
  • Automatic module layout
  • Single-line diagram
  • String sizing / stringing
  • 3D roof and obstruction model
  • On-site capture (drone / photogrammetry)
  • Remote site capture from imagery
  • Battery sizing and modelling
  • Bankable / IE-accepted simulation report
  • Loss and uncertainty modelling (P50/P90)
  • Named weather / irradiance data source
  • Public API
  • Product status
  • C&I
  • Residential
  • Utility-scale
  • Web application
  • Proposal document generation

Which might suit you

Framed as requirements, not a verdict. Both descriptions come from the same data.

Consider Arka 360 if…

  • you need a price you can plan against before talking to sales
  • AI-assisted workflows matter to you
  • your work is mostly residential

Residential and small-commercial installers who want design, shading, proposal and a light CRM in one subscription, and who are willing to buy permit plan sets from the same vendor. It is not for anyone who needs a dependable list price: the `/pricing` URL alone serves four incompatible price schedules in two currencies in a single page, and `/pricing-in` serves two different rupee schedules simultaneously. It is also not a utility-scale tool — there is no tracker or terrain workflow beyond a "single axis tracker" row in a feature table. [✓ https://arka360.com/pricing · 2026-09-25]

Full Arka 360 profile

Consider Reslink Energy if…

  • you need a price you can plan against before talking to sales
  • your systems fit within 100 kW / 500 kW / 5 MW / 100 MW
  • your work is mostly residential

Indian rooftop and C&I EPCs whose sales reps carry a phone rather than a laptop and who want the design, BOM and proposal produced on the roof. It is not for anyone who needs a price they can rely on before they call sales: the same site publishes four mutually incompatible price schedules, in two currencies, on two billing periods, with two different sets of plan names — and a fifth figure appears on its Capterra listing. [✓ https://www.reslink.org/pricing/ · 2026-09-25]

Full Reslink Energy profile

Related comparisons

Other options in design & simulation

Frequently asked

What is the main difference between Arka 360 and Reslink Energy?

They differ most on pricing model. In total we recorded 14 verified differences and 19 points where they are the same.

Which costs more, Arka 360 or Reslink Energy?

Arka 360 is priced per-seat and Reslink Energy is priced capacity-tiered. These are different pricing models, so a single side-by-side figure would be misleading. Each is shown as its vendor states it.

Is Arka 360 or Reslink Energy better?

We do not name a winner. Both are described from the same verified data, and which suits you depends on your requirements — the differences above are the facts; the choice is yours.

Last verified

Vendors change pricing and features without notice. Check the vendor’s own page before deciding.

This comparison is generated from the feature database, not written by hand. A pair is only published when the data holds at least five stateable differences — which is why 281 candidate pairs were refused. How comparisons are built