SolarSoftwares
Find Software →

100 products researched 2,422 sourced facts Verified September 2026 Methodology

Comparison

Arka 360 vs Enact

16 differences · 20 identical

Arka 360Arka360
Entry price
USD 159
Charged
Per seat
Free tier or trial
No free tier or trial
Named integrations
2
Verified data points
11
EnactEnact Systems Inc.
Entry price
USD 279
Charged
Per seat
Free tier or trial
No free tier or trial
Named integrations
1
Verified data points
11

The differences that matter most

  • Price published Published Partial
  • Entry price 159 USD per month (one of three conflicting figures) 279 USD per month billed annually
  • Annual energy yield simulation Advanced Basic

All 16 differences ↓

Arka 360 or Enact?

They differ most on price published. Arka 360 publishes USD 159; Enact publishes USD 279.

We do not name a winner. Below are 16 differences drawn from the same sourced dataset that powers both product pages.

Verified against the vendor’s own pages.

Pricing

Both use the same pricing model, so the figures below are directly comparable.

Arka 360

USD 159

159 USD per month (one of three conflicting figures)

Per seat

1 seat included

Enact

USD 279

279 USD per month billed annually

Per seat

2 seats included

10 projects

Prices are shown exactly as each vendor writes them and are never converted between currencies.

Where they differ

16 differences, ordered by how much they are likely to matter — pricing transparency first, then capabilities the vendor explicitly confirms or denies.

Legend Verified Vendor claim Not offered Not found Could not read
Differences between Arka 360 and Enact
Capability Arka 360 Enact
Solar design & simulation
Annual energy yield simulation Advanced Verified Basic Vendor claim
Automatic module layout Advanced Verified Basic Vendor claim
Bankable / IE-accepted simulation report Basic Vendor claim — Not found
Ground-mount / tracker layout Basic Vendor claim Advanced Verified
Monitoring & operations
Production monitoring — Could not read Advanced Verified
AI & automation
AI defect / anomaly detection — Could not read vendor-claimed Verified
AI design assistance vendor-claimed Verified — Could not read
Integrations & extensibility
Named, documented integrations 2 Verified 1 Verified
Platform prerequisite — Could not read AutoCAD (PVCAD plug-in tier) — or bundled at +$66/month Verified
Pricing & commercial terms
Price published Published Verified Partial Verified
Entry price 159 USD per month (one of three conflicting figures) Verified 279 USD per month billed annually Verified
Project / design cap — Could not read 10 Verified
Seat cap 1 Verified 2 Verified
Market fit & availability
Geographic availability US; IN; global Verified US; global Verified
Target buyer solo-installer; small-installer Verified — Could not read
Utility-scale No Verified Yes Verified

Scroll the table sideways to see both products. The capability column stays in place.

Where they are the same 20 data points
  • Currency
  • Pricing model
  • Free tier
  • Single-line diagram
  • String sizing / stringing
  • CAD export (DXF/DWG)
  • 3D roof and obstruction model
  • On-site capture (drone / photogrammetry)
  • Remote site capture from imagery
  • Battery sizing and modelling
  • Loss and uncertainty modelling (P50/P90)
  • Named weather / irradiance data source
  • ROI / payback calculation
  • Public API
  • Product status
  • C&I
  • Residential
  • Delivery model
  • Web application
  • Proposal document generation

Which might suit you

Framed as requirements, not a verdict. Both descriptions come from the same data.

Consider Arka 360 if…

  • you need a price you can plan against before talking to sales
  • AI-assisted workflows matter to you
  • your work is mostly residential

Residential and small-commercial installers who want design, shading, proposal and a light CRM in one subscription, and who are willing to buy permit plan sets from the same vendor. It is not for anyone who needs a dependable list price: the `/pricing` URL alone serves four incompatible price schedules in two currencies in a single page, and `/pricing-in` serves two different rupee schedules simultaneously. It is also not a utility-scale tool — there is no tracker or terrain workflow beyond a "single axis tracker" row in a feature table. [✓ https://arka360.com/pricing · 2026-09-25]

Full Arka 360 profile

Consider Enact if…

  • AI-assisted workflows matter to you
  • you work at utility scale
  • your work is mostly residential

Installers who want one vendor for sales design, permit-grade engineering and post-install monitoring, and who will pay for those as three separate line items. It is not a single unified product: the "end-to-end platform" announced in January 2026 is, as sold on 2026-09-25, three priced modules — one of which still lives on a separate domain under a separate brand, with its own pricing pages that disagree with Enact's. [✓ https://enact.solar/providers/provider-pricing/ · 2026-09-25]

Full Enact profile

Related comparisons

Other options in design & simulation

Frequently asked

What is the main difference between Arka 360 and Enact?

They differ most on price published. In total we recorded 16 verified differences and 20 points where they are the same.

Which costs more, Arka 360 or Enact?

Both are priced per seat. Arka 360: USD 159. Enact: USD 279.

Is Arka 360 or Enact better?

We do not name a winner. Both are described from the same verified data, and which suits you depends on your requirements — the differences above are the facts; the choice is yours.

Last verified

Vendors change pricing and features without notice. Check the vendor’s own page before deciding.

This comparison is generated from the feature database, not written by hand. A pair is only published when the data holds at least five stateable differences — which is why 281 candidate pairs were refused. How comparisons are built