SolarSoftwares
Find Software →

100 products researched 2,422 sourced facts Verified September 2026 Methodology

Comparison

PowerTrack vs Solytic

24 differences · 6 identical

PowerTrackAlsoEnergy, Inc. (a Stem, Inc. company)
Entry price
Not publicly disclosed
Charged
Quote only
Free tier or trial
No free tier or trial
Named integrations
0
Verified data points
8
SolyticSolytic GmbH
Entry price
Not publicly disclosed
Charged
Quote only
Free tier or trial
Free trial
Named integrations
0
Verified data points
12

The differences that matter most

  • Free tier Not offered free-trial
  • Public API Not found Advanced
  • Branded / customisable templates Not established Yes

All 24 differences ↓

PowerTrack or Solytic?

They differ most on free tier. PowerTrack publishes Not publicly disclosed; Solytic publishes Not publicly disclosed.

We do not name a winner. Below are 24 differences drawn from the same sourced dataset that powers both product pages.

Verified against the vendor’s own pages.

Pricing

Both use the same pricing model, so the figures below are directly comparable.

PowerTrack

Not publicly disclosed

Quote only

Solytic

Not publicly disclosed

Quote only

Prices are shown exactly as each vendor writes them and are never converted between currencies.

Where they differ

24 differences, ordered by how much they are likely to matter — pricing transparency first, then capabilities the vendor explicitly confirms or denies.

Legend Verified Vendor claim Not offered Not found Could not read
Differences between PowerTrack and Solytic
Capability PowerTrack Solytic
Proposals & sales
Branded / customisable templates — Could not read Yes Verified
Project & field operations
Automated customer updates — Could not read Yes Verified
Permitting & engineering
Automated code compliance check Advanced Verified — Could not read
Estimation & financial modelling
PPA / lease / TPO modelling — Could not read — Not found
Monitoring & operations
Alerts and fault detection Advanced Verified — Could not read
Portfolio / fleet view — Could not read Advanced Verified
Production monitoring Advanced Verified Not offered Verified
Weather-adjusted expected production Yes Verified — Could not read
Work order / CMMS Basic Vendor claim Advanced Verified
Inspection & data capture operations
Automated fault diagnosis — Could not read — Not found
SCADA / real-time plant control Advanced Verified — Not applicable
Reporting, data & BI
Automated / scheduled reporting Advanced Verified — Could not read
BI tool integration — Could not read advanced Verified
Integrations & extensibility
Public API — Not found Advanced Verified
Claimed integration count — Could not read 40 Vendor claim
Platform & deployment
Delivery model hardware+software Verified software Verified
Role-based access control — Could not read Yes Verified
Web application — Could not read Yes Verified
Pricing & commercial terms
Free tier Not offered Verified free-trial Verified
Self-serve signup — Not found — Could not read
Market fit & availability
Geographic availability US; EMEA; JP; global Verified DE; DACH; EU; global Verified
Product status active — but the brand is mid-migration to stem.com (see Red flags) Verified acquired Verified
Target buyer o&m-provider Verified — Could not read
Utility-scale Yes Verified No Verified

Scroll the table sideways to see both products. The capability column stays in place.

Where they are the same 6 data points
  • Price published
  • Pricing model
  • Multi-vendor hardware / data ingest
  • Named, documented integrations
  • C&I
  • Residential

Which might suit you

Framed as requirements, not a verdict. Both descriptions come from the same data.

Consider PowerTrack if…

  • you work at utility scale

It is for utility, C&I and aggregated-residential fleet owners, EPCs, O&M providers and control-room operators who need one platform across mixed hardware and who are willing to run an enterprise procurement (no price is published anywhere on either vendor site). It is not for a single-site residential owner, not for anyone who wants to self-serve a signup, and not for a buyer who needs a published price before taking a sales call.

Full PowerTrack profile

Consider Solytic if…

  • your work is mostly residential

For installers, O&M firms and asset managers running mixed-brand residential and commercial rooftop portfolios who are tired of one portal per manufacturer, and for businesses that want to resell monitoring under their own brand. Not for anyone who needs a price before a sales conversation — Solytic publishes none — or anyone whose buying process requires a written list of exactly which 40+ manufacturers are supported, because the link to that list does not go to a list.

Full Solytic profile

Related comparisons

Other options in monitoring & asset mgmt

Frequently asked

What is the main difference between PowerTrack and Solytic?

They differ most on free tier. In total we recorded 24 verified differences and 6 points where they are the same.

Which costs more, PowerTrack or Solytic?

Both are priced quote only. PowerTrack: Not publicly disclosed. Solytic: Not publicly disclosed.

Is PowerTrack or Solytic better?

We do not name a winner. Both are described from the same verified data, and which suits you depends on your requirements — the differences above are the facts; the choice is yours.

Last verified

Vendors change pricing and features without notice. Check the vendor’s own page before deciding.

This comparison is generated from the feature database, not written by hand. A pair is only published when the data holds at least five stateable differences — which is why 281 candidate pairs were refused. How comparisons are built