SolarSoftwares
Find Software →

100 products researched 2,422 sourced facts Verified September 2026 Methodology

Comparison

SolarEdge Designer vs Solargis Evaluate

23 differences · 10 identical

SolarEdge DesignerSolarEdge Technologies
Entry price
Free
Charged
Free
Free tier or trial
Free tier, no time limit
Named integrations
2
Verified data points
9
Solargis EvaluateSolargis
Entry price
EUR 12000
Charged
Per seat
Free tier or trial
No free tier or trial
Named integrations
0
Verified data points
7

The differences that matter most

  • Pricing model free per-seat
  • Free tier free-forever Not offered
  • Entry price 0 USD no licence or subscription fees 12000 EUR subscription

All 23 differences ↓

SolarEdge Designer or Solargis Evaluate?

They differ most on pricing model. SolarEdge Designer publishes Free; Solargis Evaluate publishes EUR 12000. They use different pricing models, so those figures do not compare directly.

We do not name a winner. Below are 23 differences drawn from the same sourced dataset that powers both product pages.

Verified against the vendor’s own pages.

Pricing

These cannot be compared on a single number

SolarEdge Designer is priced free and Solargis Evaluate is priced per-seat. These are different pricing models, so a single side-by-side figure would be misleading. Each is shown as its vendor states it.

SolarEdge Designer

Free

0 USD no licence or subscription fees

Free

Solargis Evaluate

EUR 12000

12000 EUR subscription

Per seat

60 projects

Prices are shown exactly as each vendor writes them and are never converted between currencies.

Where they differ

23 differences, ordered by how much they are likely to matter — pricing transparency first, then capabilities the vendor explicitly confirms or denies.

Legend Verified Vendor claim Not offered Not found Could not read
Differences between SolarEdge Designer and Solargis Evaluate
Capability SolarEdge Designer Solargis Evaluate
Solar design & simulation
Battery sizing and modelling Advanced Verified — Not found
CAD export (DXF/DWG) Yes Verified — Not found
Ground-mount / tracker layout — Not found Advanced Verified
Loss and uncertainty modelling (P50/P90) — Not found Basic Verified
Named weather / irradiance data source — Not found advanced Verified
Bankable / IE-accepted simulation report — Not found Basic Vendor claim
Inverter sizing Advanced Verified — Could not read
Proposals & sales
E-signature — Could not read — Not found
Proposal document generation Advanced Verified — Could not read
Estimation & financial modelling
ROI / payback calculation Advanced Verified — Not found
Reporting, data & BI
Report / deliverable export — Could not read Advanced Verified
AI & automation
AI design assistance vendor-claimed Verified — Could not read
Integrations & extensibility
Named, documented integrations 2 Verified 0 Verified
Public API — Not found Basic Vendor claim
Platform & deployment
Delivery model software Verified hybrid Verified
Pricing & commercial terms
Pricing model free Verified per-seat Verified
Free tier free-forever Verified Not offered Verified
Entry price 0 USD no licence or subscription fees Verified 12000 EUR subscription Verified
Currency USD Verified EUR Verified
Project / design cap — Could not read 60 Verified
Market fit & availability
Residential Yes Verified No Verified
Target buyer — Could not read developer Verified
Utility-scale No Verified Yes Verified

Scroll the table sideways to see both products. The capability column stays in place.

Where they are the same 10 data points
  • Price published
  • Automatic module layout
  • Single-line diagram
  • Shading analysis
  • Remote site capture from imagery
  • Annual energy yield simulation
  • Geographic availability
  • Product status
  • C&I
  • Web application

Which might suit you

Framed as requirements, not a verdict. Both descriptions come from the same data.

Consider SolarEdge Designer if…

  • you need a price you can plan against before talking to sales
  • you want to start without a budget approval
  • AI-assisted workflows matter to you
  • your work is mostly residential

For installers designing SolarEdge systems who want design, compliance checking and a proposal at no cost, integrated with the SolarEdge Monitoring Platform. Not for vendor-neutral design work: the vendor's own copy scopes it to "all your SolarEdge systems" and to compliance with "the latest SolarEdge design rules". Any comparison page must state that the price is zero because the product sells inverters, not software.

Full SolarEdge Designer profile

Consider Solargis Evaluate if…

  • you need a price you can plan against before talking to sales
  • you work at utility scale

For utility-scale developers, engineers and IEs who are already buying Solargis data and want the design and simulation layer on top of it, with reports investors accept. Not for residential or rooftop sales work, not for anyone needing CAD/construction deliverables, and not for small teams — the published entry subscription is €12,000 and the project allowance is 60 "Early Stage" projects.

Full Solargis Evaluate profile

Related comparisons

Other options in design & simulation

Frequently asked

What is the main difference between SolarEdge Designer and Solargis Evaluate?

They differ most on pricing model. In total we recorded 23 verified differences and 10 points where they are the same.

Which costs more, SolarEdge Designer or Solargis Evaluate?

SolarEdge Designer is priced free and Solargis Evaluate is priced per-seat. These are different pricing models, so a single side-by-side figure would be misleading. Each is shown as its vendor states it.

Is SolarEdge Designer or Solargis Evaluate better?

We do not name a winner. Both are described from the same verified data, and which suits you depends on your requirements — the differences above are the facts; the choice is yours.

Last verified

Vendors change pricing and features without notice. Check the vendor’s own page before deciding.

This comparison is generated from the feature database, not written by hand. A pair is only published when the data holds at least five stateable differences — which is why 281 candidate pairs were refused. How comparisons are built