SolarSoftwares
Find Software →

100 products researched 2,422 sourced facts Verified September 2026 Methodology

Comparison

HelioScope vs Solargis Evaluate

28 differences · 9 identical

HelioScopeAurora Solar Inc. (acquired Folsom Labs, 2019)
Entry price
USD 159
Charged
Capacity tiered
Free tier or trial
Free trial
Named integrations
1
Verified data points
12
Solargis EvaluateSolargis
Entry price
EUR 12000
Charged
Per seat
Free tier or trial
No free tier or trial
Named integrations
0
Verified data points
7

The differences that matter most

  • Price published Partial Published
  • Pricing model capacity-tiered per-seat
  • Free tier free-trial Not offered

All 28 differences ↓

HelioScope or Solargis Evaluate?

They differ most on price published. HelioScope publishes USD 159; Solargis Evaluate publishes EUR 12000. They use different pricing models, so those figures do not compare directly.

We do not name a winner. Below are 28 differences drawn from the same sourced dataset that powers both product pages.

Verified against the vendor’s own pages.

Pricing

These cannot be compared on a single number

HelioScope is priced capacity-tiered and Solargis Evaluate is priced per-seat. These are different pricing models, so a single side-by-side figure would be misleading. Each is shown as its vendor states it.

HelioScope

USD 159

159 USD per licence/month

Capacity tiered

Size ceiling: 1.25 MW DC (Basic) / 5 MW (Pro) / 30 MW (Enterprise)

1 seat included

10 projects

Solargis Evaluate

EUR 12000

12000 EUR subscription

Per seat

60 projects

Prices are shown exactly as each vendor writes them and are never converted between currencies.

Where they differ

28 differences, ordered by how much they are likely to matter — pricing transparency first, then capabilities the vendor explicitly confirms or denies.

Legend Verified Vendor claim Not offered Not found Could not read
Differences between HelioScope and Solargis Evaluate
Capability HelioScope Solargis Evaluate
Solar design & simulation
Battery sizing and modelling Advanced Verified — Not found
CAD export (DXF/DWG) Yes Verified — Not found
Single-line diagram Advanced Verified — Not found
Export to other simulation tools none Verified — Could not read
Ground-mount / tracker layout Not offered Verified Advanced Verified
Inverter sizing Basic Vendor claim — Could not read
Loss and uncertainty modelling (P50/P90) Advanced Verified Basic Verified
Named weather / irradiance data source basic Vendor claim advanced Verified
Proposals & sales
E-signature — Verified — Not found
Proposal document generation Advanced Verified — Could not read
Estimation & financial modelling
ROI / payback calculation Advanced Verified — Not found
Reporting, data & BI
Report / deliverable export — Could not read Advanced Verified
AI & automation
AI defect / anomaly detection not-claimed Not found — Could not read
AI design assistance vendor-claimed Verified — Could not read
Integrations & extensibility
Named, documented integrations 1 Verified 0 Verified
Public API Advanced Verified Basic Vendor claim
Platform & deployment
Delivery model software Verified hybrid Verified
Pricing & commercial terms
Price published Partial Verified Published Verified
Pricing model capacity-tiered Verified per-seat Verified
Free tier free-trial Verified Not offered Verified
Entry price 159 USD per licence/month Verified 12000 EUR subscription Verified
Currency USD Verified EUR Verified
Project / design cap 10 Verified 60 Verified
Seat cap 1 Verified — Could not read
System size cap 1.25 MW DC (Basic) / 5 MW (Pro) / 30 MW (Enterprise) Verified — Could not read
Market fit & availability
Geographic availability US; global Verified global Verified
Target buyer small-installer; engineering-firm Verified developer Verified
Utility-scale No Verified Yes Verified

Scroll the table sideways to see both products. The capability column stays in place.

Where they are the same 9 data points
  • Automatic module layout
  • Shading analysis
  • Remote site capture from imagery
  • Annual energy yield simulation
  • Bankable / IE-accepted simulation report
  • Product status
  • C&I
  • Residential
  • Web application

Which might suit you

Framed as requirements, not a verdict. Both descriptions come from the same data.

Consider HelioScope if…

  • your systems fit within 1.25 MW DC (Basic) / 5 MW (Pro) / 30 MW (Enterprise)
  • AI-assisted workflows matter to you

For C&I designers and engineers who need a layout, a bankable-grade production estimate and a sales proposal without leaving one tool. Not for residential one-roof sales work (the same vendor routes that to Aurora) and not for jobs above 30 MW DC — the vendor publishes a hard design-size cap on every tier.

Full HelioScope profile

Consider Solargis Evaluate if…

  • you need a price you can plan against before talking to sales
  • you work at utility scale

For utility-scale developers, engineers and IEs who are already buying Solargis data and want the design and simulation layer on top of it, with reports investors accept. Not for residential or rooftop sales work, not for anyone needing CAD/construction deliverables, and not for small teams — the published entry subscription is €12,000 and the project allowance is 60 "Early Stage" projects.

Full Solargis Evaluate profile

Related comparisons

Other options in design & simulation

Frequently asked

What is the main difference between HelioScope and Solargis Evaluate?

They differ most on price published. In total we recorded 28 verified differences and 9 points where they are the same.

Which costs more, HelioScope or Solargis Evaluate?

HelioScope is priced capacity-tiered and Solargis Evaluate is priced per-seat. These are different pricing models, so a single side-by-side figure would be misleading. Each is shown as its vendor states it.

Is HelioScope or Solargis Evaluate better?

We do not name a winner. Both are described from the same verified data, and which suits you depends on your requirements — the differences above are the facts; the choice is yours.

Last verified

Vendors change pricing and features without notice. Check the vendor’s own page before deciding.

This comparison is generated from the feature database, not written by hand. A pair is only published when the data holds at least five stateable differences — which is why 281 candidate pairs were refused. How comparisons are built