SolarSoftwares
Find Software →

100 products researched 2,422 sourced facts Verified September 2026 Methodology

Comparison

RatedPower (pvDesign) vs SolarEdge Designer

21 differences · 12 identical

RatedPower (pvDesign)RatedPower (part of Enverus)
Entry price
Not publicly disclosed
Charged
Quote only
Free tier or trial
Demo only, no trial
Named integrations
4
Verified data points
9
SolarEdge DesignerSolarEdge Technologies
Entry price
Free
Charged
Free
Free tier or trial
Free tier, no time limit
Named integrations
2
Verified data points
9

The differences that matter most

  • Price published Not published Published
  • Pricing model quote-only free
  • Free tier demo-only free-forever

All 21 differences ↓

RatedPower (pvDesign) or SolarEdge Designer?

They differ most on price published. RatedPower (pvDesign) publishes Not publicly disclosed; SolarEdge Designer publishes Free. They use different pricing models, so those figures do not compare directly.

We do not name a winner. Below are 21 differences drawn from the same sourced dataset that powers both product pages.

Verified against the vendor’s own pages.

Pricing

These cannot be compared on a single number

RatedPower (pvDesign) is priced quote-only and SolarEdge Designer is priced free. These are different pricing models, so a single side-by-side figure would be misleading. Each is shown as its vendor states it.

RatedPower (pvDesign)

Not publicly disclosed

Quote only

SolarEdge Designer

Free

0 USD no licence or subscription fees

Free

Prices are shown exactly as each vendor writes them and are never converted between currencies.

Where they differ

21 differences, ordered by how much they are likely to matter — pricing transparency first, then capabilities the vendor explicitly confirms or denies.

Legend Verified Vendor claim Not offered Not found Could not read
Differences between RatedPower (pvDesign) and SolarEdge Designer
Capability RatedPower (pvDesign) SolarEdge Designer
Solar design & simulation
Ground-mount / tracker layout Advanced Verified — Not found
Bankable / IE-accepted simulation report Basic Vendor claim — Not found
Inverter sizing — Could not read Advanced Verified
Loss and uncertainty modelling (P50/P90) Basic Vendor claim — Not found
Manual layout editing — Verified — Could not read
Shading analysis Basic Vendor claim Advanced Verified
Single-line diagram Basic Vendor claim — Not found
Proposals & sales
E-signature Yes Verified — Could not read
AI & automation
AI agent / copilot vendor-claimed Verified — Could not read
AI design assistance — Could not read vendor-claimed Verified
Integrations & extensibility
Named, documented integrations 4 Verified 2 Verified
Public API Basic Vendor claim — Not found
Pricing & commercial terms
Price published Not published Verified Published Verified
Pricing model quote-only Verified free Verified
Free tier demo-only Verified free-forever Verified
Entry price — Could not read 0 USD no licence or subscription fees Verified
Currency — Could not read USD Verified
Market fit & availability
C&I No Verified Yes Verified
Residential No Verified Yes Verified
Target buyer enterprise-epc; developer Verified — Could not read
Utility-scale Yes Verified No Verified

Scroll the table sideways to see both products. The capability column stays in place.

Where they are the same 12 data points
  • Automatic module layout
  • CAD export (DXF/DWG)
  • Remote site capture from imagery
  • Battery sizing and modelling
  • Annual energy yield simulation
  • Named weather / irradiance data source
  • ROI / payback calculation
  • Geographic availability
  • Product status
  • Delivery model
  • Web application
  • Proposal document generation

Which might suit you

Framed as requirements, not a verdict. Both descriptions come from the same data.

Consider RatedPower (pvDesign) if…

  • AI-assisted workflows matter to you
  • you work at utility scale

For developers, IPPs, EPCs and engineering firms who need to iterate hundreds of utility-scale layouts and carry them through to interconnection and off-taker-ready detailed engineering. Not for anyone who needs a published price (all three tiers are "Talk to sales"), not for rooftop or residential, and not for buyers who need site prospecting outside the specific geographies where Enverus PRISM International data is licensed.

Full RatedPower (pvDesign) profile

Consider SolarEdge Designer if…

  • you need a price you can plan against before talking to sales
  • you want to start without a budget approval
  • AI-assisted workflows matter to you
  • your work is mostly residential

For installers designing SolarEdge systems who want design, compliance checking and a proposal at no cost, integrated with the SolarEdge Monitoring Platform. Not for vendor-neutral design work: the vendor's own copy scopes it to "all your SolarEdge systems" and to compliance with "the latest SolarEdge design rules". Any comparison page must state that the price is zero because the product sells inverters, not software.

Full SolarEdge Designer profile

Related comparisons

Other options in design & simulation

Frequently asked

What is the main difference between RatedPower (pvDesign) and SolarEdge Designer?

They differ most on price published. In total we recorded 21 verified differences and 12 points where they are the same.

Which costs more, RatedPower (pvDesign) or SolarEdge Designer?

RatedPower (pvDesign) is priced quote-only and SolarEdge Designer is priced free. These are different pricing models, so a single side-by-side figure would be misleading. Each is shown as its vendor states it.

Is RatedPower (pvDesign) or SolarEdge Designer better?

We do not name a winner. Both are described from the same verified data, and which suits you depends on your requirements — the differences above are the facts; the choice is yours.

Last verified

Vendors change pricing and features without notice. Check the vendor’s own page before deciding.

This comparison is generated from the feature database, not written by hand. A pair is only published when the data holds at least five stateable differences — which is why 281 candidate pairs were refused. How comparisons are built