SolarSoftwares
Find Software →

100 products researched 2,422 sourced facts Verified September 2026 Methodology

Comparison

PlantPredict vs PV*SOL premium

25 differences · 9 identical

PlantPredictTerabase Energy
Entry price
Could not verify
Charged
Not established
Free tier or trial
Not established
Named integrations
0
Verified data points
12
PV*SOL premiumValentin Software GmbH
Entry price
EUR 845
Charged
Per seat
Free tier or trial
Free trial
Named integrations
20
Verified data points
11

The differences that matter most

  • Price published Not established Published
  • Pricing model Not established per-seat
  • Free tier Not established free-trial

All 25 differences ↓

PlantPredict or PV*SOL premium?

They differ most on price published. PlantPredict publishes Could not verify; PV*SOL premium publishes EUR 845. They use different pricing models, so those figures do not compare directly.

We do not name a winner. Below are 25 differences drawn from the same sourced dataset that powers both product pages.

Verified against the vendor’s own pages.

Pricing

These cannot be compared on a single number

PlantPredict is priced on an unrecorded basis and PV*SOL premium is priced per-seat. These are different pricing models, so a single side-by-side figure would be misleading. Each is shown as its vendor states it.

PlantPredict

Could not verify

Model not established

PV*SOL premium

EUR 845

845 EUR per named user/year, plus VAT

Per seat

Prices are shown exactly as each vendor writes them and are never converted between currencies.

Where they differ

25 differences, ordered by how much they are likely to matter — pricing transparency first, then capabilities the vendor explicitly confirms or denies.

Legend Verified Vendor claim Not offered Not found Could not read
Differences between PlantPredict and PV*SOL premium
Capability PlantPredict PV*SOL premium
Solar design & simulation
Ground-mount / tracker layout Advanced Verified — Not found
Loss and uncertainty modelling (P50/P90) Advanced Verified — Not found
Single-line diagram — Not found Advanced Verified
Bankable / IE-accepted simulation report Advanced Verified Basic Vendor claim
Inverter sizing — Could not read Advanced Verified
Named weather / irradiance data source basic Vendor claim advanced Verified
String sizing / stringing Advanced Verified — Could not read
Proposals & sales
Proposal document generation — Could not read Advanced Verified
Reporting, data & BI
Report / deliverable export Advanced Verified — Could not read
AI & automation
AI agent / copilot Not offered Verified — Could not read
Integrations & extensibility
MCP server — Verified — Could not read
Named, documented integrations — Could not read 20 Verified
Public API Advanced Verified Basic Vendor claim
Platform & deployment
Desktop OS support — Could not read Windows 10/11 64-bit; .NET 4.8; internet required Verified
Web application — Could not read No Verified
Pricing & commercial terms
Price published — Could not read Published Verified
Pricing model — Could not read per-seat Verified
Free tier — Could not read free-trial Verified
Entry price — Could not read 845 EUR per named user/year, plus VAT Verified
Currency — Could not read EUR Verified
Market fit & availability
C&I No Verified Yes Verified
Geographic availability US; global Verified DE; EU; global Verified
Residential No Verified Yes Verified
Target buyer — Could not read engineering-firm; small-installer Verified
Utility-scale Yes Verified No Verified

Scroll the table sideways to see both products. The capability column stays in place.

Where they are the same 9 data points
  • Automatic module layout
  • CAD export (DXF/DWG)
  • Shading analysis
  • Remote site capture from imagery
  • Battery sizing and modelling
  • Annual energy yield simulation
  • ROI / payback calculation
  • Product status
  • Delivery model

Which might suit you

Framed as requirements, not a verdict. Both descriptions come from the same data.

Consider PlantPredict if…

  • you work at utility scale

For utility-scale energy modellers and IEs who want a browser tool with unlimited projects, a documented algorithm set their lender's IE can audit, and automation. **Not for residential or C&I rooftop sales work, not for** teams that need layout-to-construction CAD (Design Pro is GIS-based, not an AutoCAD product), and not for anyone taking the site's structured data at face value — its schema publishes a price that its own pricing page contradicts.

Full PlantPredict profile

Consider PV*SOL premium if…

  • you need a price you can plan against before talking to sales
  • you need it to connect to tools you already run (20 named)
  • you are comfortable with desktop software and its constraints
  • your work is mostly residential

For European installers, planners, roofers and energy consultants doing residential and commercial rooftop work where realistic 3D shading, battery/EV/heat-pump self-consumption and a presentable customer report matter. Not for utility-scale ground-mount engineering (the published ceiling is 7,500 mounted / 10,000 roof-parallel modules), not for macOS, and not for anyone needing a cloud or multi-user workspace.

Full PV*SOL premium profile

Related comparisons

Other options in design & simulation

Frequently asked

What is the main difference between PlantPredict and PV*SOL premium?

They differ most on price published. In total we recorded 25 verified differences and 9 points where they are the same.

Which costs more, PlantPredict or PV*SOL premium?

PlantPredict is priced on an unrecorded basis and PV*SOL premium is priced per-seat. These are different pricing models, so a single side-by-side figure would be misleading. Each is shown as its vendor states it.

Is PlantPredict or PV*SOL premium better?

We do not name a winner. Both are described from the same verified data, and which suits you depends on your requirements — the differences above are the facts; the choice is yours.

Last verified

Vendors change pricing and features without notice. Check the vendor’s own page before deciding.

This comparison is generated from the feature database, not written by hand. A pair is only published when the data holds at least five stateable differences — which is why 281 candidate pairs were refused. How comparisons are built