SolarSoftwares
Find Software →

100 products researched 2,422 sourced facts Verified September 2026 Methodology

Comparison

HelioScope vs SolarEdge Designer

21 differences · 15 identical

HelioScopeAurora Solar Inc. (acquired Folsom Labs, 2019)
Entry price
USD 159
Charged
Capacity tiered
Free tier or trial
Free trial
Named integrations
1
Verified data points
12
SolarEdge DesignerSolarEdge Technologies
Entry price
Free
Charged
Free
Free tier or trial
Free tier, no time limit
Named integrations
2
Verified data points
9

The differences that matter most

  • Price published Partial Published
  • Pricing model capacity-tiered free
  • Free tier free-trial free-forever

All 21 differences ↓

HelioScope or SolarEdge Designer?

They differ most on price published. HelioScope publishes USD 159; SolarEdge Designer publishes Free. They use different pricing models, so those figures do not compare directly.

We do not name a winner. Below are 21 differences drawn from the same sourced dataset that powers both product pages.

Verified against the vendor’s own pages.

Pricing

These cannot be compared on a single number

HelioScope is priced capacity-tiered and SolarEdge Designer is priced free. These are different pricing models, so a single side-by-side figure would be misleading. Each is shown as its vendor states it.

HelioScope

USD 159

159 USD per licence/month

Capacity tiered

Size ceiling: 1.25 MW DC (Basic) / 5 MW (Pro) / 30 MW (Enterprise)

1 seat included

10 projects

SolarEdge Designer

Free

0 USD no licence or subscription fees

Free

Prices are shown exactly as each vendor writes them and are never converted between currencies.

Where they differ

21 differences, ordered by how much they are likely to matter — pricing transparency first, then capabilities the vendor explicitly confirms or denies.

Legend Verified Vendor claim Not offered Not found Could not read
Differences between HelioScope and SolarEdge Designer
Capability HelioScope SolarEdge Designer
Solar design & simulation
Ground-mount / tracker layout Not offered Verified — Not found
Loss and uncertainty modelling (P50/P90) Advanced Verified — Not found
Single-line diagram Advanced Verified — Not found
Bankable / IE-accepted simulation report Basic Vendor claim — Not found
Export to other simulation tools none Verified — Could not read
Inverter sizing Basic Vendor claim Advanced Verified
Named weather / irradiance data source basic Vendor claim — Not found
Proposals & sales
E-signature — Verified — Could not read
AI & automation
AI defect / anomaly detection not-claimed Not found — Could not read
Integrations & extensibility
Public API Advanced Verified — Not found
Named, documented integrations 1 Verified 2 Verified
Pricing & commercial terms
Price published Partial Verified Published Verified
Pricing model capacity-tiered Verified free Verified
Free tier free-trial Verified free-forever Verified
Entry price 159 USD per licence/month Verified 0 USD no licence or subscription fees Verified
Project / design cap 10 Verified — Could not read
Seat cap 1 Verified — Could not read
System size cap 1.25 MW DC (Basic) / 5 MW (Pro) / 30 MW (Enterprise) Verified — Could not read
Market fit & availability
Geographic availability US; global Verified global Verified
Residential No Verified Yes Verified
Target buyer small-installer; engineering-firm Verified — Could not read

Scroll the table sideways to see both products. The capability column stays in place.

Where they are the same 15 data points
  • AI design assistance
  • Currency
  • Automatic module layout
  • CAD export (DXF/DWG)
  • Shading analysis
  • Remote site capture from imagery
  • Battery sizing and modelling
  • Annual energy yield simulation
  • ROI / payback calculation
  • Product status
  • C&I
  • Utility-scale
  • Delivery model
  • Web application
  • Proposal document generation

Which might suit you

Framed as requirements, not a verdict. Both descriptions come from the same data.

Consider HelioScope if…

  • your systems fit within 1.25 MW DC (Basic) / 5 MW (Pro) / 30 MW (Enterprise)
  • AI-assisted workflows matter to you

For C&I designers and engineers who need a layout, a bankable-grade production estimate and a sales proposal without leaving one tool. Not for residential one-roof sales work (the same vendor routes that to Aurora) and not for jobs above 30 MW DC — the vendor publishes a hard design-size cap on every tier.

Full HelioScope profile

Consider SolarEdge Designer if…

  • you need a price you can plan against before talking to sales
  • you want to start without a budget approval
  • AI-assisted workflows matter to you
  • your work is mostly residential

For installers designing SolarEdge systems who want design, compliance checking and a proposal at no cost, integrated with the SolarEdge Monitoring Platform. Not for vendor-neutral design work: the vendor's own copy scopes it to "all your SolarEdge systems" and to compliance with "the latest SolarEdge design rules". Any comparison page must state that the price is zero because the product sells inverters, not software.

Full SolarEdge Designer profile

Related comparisons

Other options in design & simulation

Frequently asked

What is the main difference between HelioScope and SolarEdge Designer?

They differ most on price published. In total we recorded 21 verified differences and 15 points where they are the same.

Which costs more, HelioScope or SolarEdge Designer?

HelioScope is priced capacity-tiered and SolarEdge Designer is priced free. These are different pricing models, so a single side-by-side figure would be misleading. Each is shown as its vendor states it.

Is HelioScope or SolarEdge Designer better?

We do not name a winner. Both are described from the same verified data, and which suits you depends on your requirements — the differences above are the facts; the choice is yours.

Last verified

Vendors change pricing and features without notice. Check the vendor’s own page before deciding.

This comparison is generated from the feature database, not written by hand. A pair is only published when the data holds at least five stateable differences — which is why 281 candidate pairs were refused. How comparisons are built