SolarSoftwares
Find Software →

100 products researched 2,422 sourced facts Verified September 2026 Methodology

Comparison

Arka 360 vs Aurora Solar

18 differences · 18 identical

Arka 360Arka360
Entry price
USD 159
Charged
Per seat
Free tier or trial
No free tier or trial
Named integrations
2
Verified data points
11
Aurora SolarAurora Solar Inc.
Entry price
USD 159
Charged
Per seat
Free tier or trial
No free tier or trial
Named integrations
7
Verified data points
9

The differences that matter most

  • Price published Published Partial
  • Entry price 159 USD per month (one of three conflicting figures) 159 USD per user/month
  • CAD export (DXF/DWG) Yes Not found

All 18 differences ↓

Arka 360 or Aurora Solar?

They differ most on price published. Arka 360 publishes USD 159; Aurora Solar publishes USD 159.

We do not name a winner. Below are 18 differences drawn from the same sourced dataset that powers both product pages.

Verified against the vendor’s own pages.

Pricing

Both use the same pricing model, so the figures below are directly comparable.

Arka 360

USD 159

159 USD per month (one of three conflicting figures)

Per seat

1 seat included

Aurora Solar

USD 159

159 USD per user/month

Per seat

1 seat included

50 projects

Prices are shown exactly as each vendor writes them and are never converted between currencies.

Where they differ

18 differences, ordered by how much they are likely to matter — pricing transparency first, then capabilities the vendor explicitly confirms or denies.

Legend Verified Vendor claim Not offered Not found Could not read
Differences between Arka 360 and Aurora Solar
Capability Arka 360 Aurora Solar
Solar design & simulation
CAD export (DXF/DWG) Yes Verified — Not found
Loss and uncertainty modelling (P50/P90) Advanced Verified — Not found
Single-line diagram Advanced Verified — Not found
3D roof and obstruction model Advanced Verified — Could not read
Ground-mount / tracker layout Basic Vendor claim — Not applicable
Inverter sizing — Could not read Advanced Verified
On-site capture (drone / photogrammetry) — Not found — Could not read
Shading analysis — Could not read Advanced Verified
String sizing / stringing Advanced Verified — Could not read
Integrations & extensibility
Named, documented integrations 2 Verified 7 Verified
Public API Basic Vendor claim Advanced Verified
Pricing & commercial terms
Price published Published Verified Partial Verified
Entry price 159 USD per month (one of three conflicting figures) Verified 159 USD per user/month Verified
Project / design cap — Could not read 50 Verified
Market fit & availability
C&I Yes Verified No Verified
Geographic availability US; IN; global Verified US; CA; EU Verified
Jurisdictional compliance capability — Could not read us-nec Verified
Target buyer solo-installer; small-installer Verified small-installer; sales-org Verified

Scroll the table sideways to see both products. The capability column stays in place.

Where they are the same 18 data points
  • AI design assistance
  • Seat cap
  • Currency
  • Pricing model
  • Free tier
  • Automatic module layout
  • Remote site capture from imagery
  • Battery sizing and modelling
  • Annual energy yield simulation
  • Bankable / IE-accepted simulation report
  • Named weather / irradiance data source
  • ROI / payback calculation
  • Product status
  • Residential
  • Utility-scale
  • Delivery model
  • Web application
  • Proposal document generation

Which might suit you

Framed as requirements, not a verdict. Both descriptions come from the same data.

Consider Arka 360 if…

  • you need a price you can plan against before talking to sales
  • AI-assisted workflows matter to you
  • your work is mostly residential

Residential and small-commercial installers who want design, shading, proposal and a light CRM in one subscription, and who are willing to buy permit plan sets from the same vendor. It is not for anyone who needs a dependable list price: the `/pricing` URL alone serves four incompatible price schedules in two currencies in a single page, and `/pricing-in` serves two different rupee schedules simultaneously. It is also not a utility-scale tool — there is no tracker or terrain workflow beyond a "single axis tracker" row in a feature table. [✓ https://arka360.com/pricing · 2026-09-25]

Full Arka 360 profile

Consider Aurora Solar if…

  • you need it to connect to tools you already run (7 named)
  • AI-assisted workflows matter to you
  • your work is mostly residential

For residential installers and dealer/sales organisations who need design accuracy and a proposal in the same tool, on a per-seat subscription. Not for utility-scale or large C&I work — the vendor's own navigation routes "Commercial" to a different product (HelioScope), and the Aurora plan tables cap Basic/Premium at 1 user and 50 projects/month.

Full Aurora Solar profile

Related comparisons

Other options in design & simulation

Frequently asked

What is the main difference between Arka 360 and Aurora Solar?

They differ most on price published. In total we recorded 18 verified differences and 18 points where they are the same.

Which costs more, Arka 360 or Aurora Solar?

Both are priced per seat. Arka 360: USD 159. Aurora Solar: USD 159.

Is Arka 360 or Aurora Solar better?

We do not name a winner. Both are described from the same verified data, and which suits you depends on your requirements — the differences above are the facts; the choice is yours.

Last verified

Vendors change pricing and features without notice. Check the vendor’s own page before deciding.

This comparison is generated from the feature database, not written by hand. A pair is only published when the data holds at least five stateable differences — which is why 281 candidate pairs were refused. How comparisons are built