SolarSoftwares
Find Software →

100 products researched 2,422 sourced facts Verified September 2026 Methodology

Comparison

RatedPower (pvDesign) vs Solargis Evaluate

22 differences · 11 identical

RatedPower (pvDesign)RatedPower (part of Enverus)
Entry price
Not publicly disclosed
Charged
Quote only
Free tier or trial
Demo only, no trial
Named integrations
4
Verified data points
9
Solargis EvaluateSolargis
Entry price
EUR 12000
Charged
Per seat
Free tier or trial
No free tier or trial
Named integrations
0
Verified data points
7

The differences that matter most

  • Price published Not published Published
  • Pricing model quote-only per-seat
  • Free tier demo-only Not offered

All 22 differences ↓

RatedPower (pvDesign) or Solargis Evaluate?

They differ most on price published. RatedPower (pvDesign) publishes Not publicly disclosed; Solargis Evaluate publishes EUR 12000. They use different pricing models, so those figures do not compare directly.

We do not name a winner. Below are 22 differences drawn from the same sourced dataset that powers both product pages.

Verified against the vendor’s own pages.

Pricing

These cannot be compared on a single number

RatedPower (pvDesign) is priced quote-only and Solargis Evaluate is priced per-seat. These are different pricing models, so a single side-by-side figure would be misleading. Each is shown as its vendor states it.

RatedPower (pvDesign)

Not publicly disclosed

Quote only

Solargis Evaluate

EUR 12000

12000 EUR subscription

Per seat

60 projects

Prices are shown exactly as each vendor writes them and are never converted between currencies.

Where they differ

22 differences, ordered by how much they are likely to matter — pricing transparency first, then capabilities the vendor explicitly confirms or denies.

Legend Verified Vendor claim Not offered Not found Could not read
Differences between RatedPower (pvDesign) and Solargis Evaluate
Capability RatedPower (pvDesign) Solargis Evaluate
Solar design & simulation
Battery sizing and modelling Advanced Verified — Not found
CAD export (DXF/DWG) Yes Verified — Not found
Named weather / irradiance data source — Not found advanced Verified
Loss and uncertainty modelling (P50/P90) Basic Vendor claim Basic Verified
Manual layout editing — Verified — Could not read
Shading analysis Basic Vendor claim Advanced Verified
Single-line diagram Basic Vendor claim — Not found
Proposals & sales
E-signature Yes Verified — Not found
Proposal document generation Advanced Verified — Could not read
Estimation & financial modelling
ROI / payback calculation Advanced Verified — Not found
Reporting, data & BI
Report / deliverable export — Could not read Advanced Verified
AI & automation
AI agent / copilot vendor-claimed Verified — Could not read
Integrations & extensibility
Named, documented integrations 4 Verified 0 Verified
Platform & deployment
Delivery model software Verified hybrid Verified
Pricing & commercial terms
Price published Not published Verified Published Verified
Pricing model quote-only Verified per-seat Verified
Free tier demo-only Verified Not offered Verified
Entry price — Could not read 12000 EUR subscription Verified
Currency — Could not read EUR Verified
Project / design cap — Could not read 60 Verified
Market fit & availability
C&I No Verified Yes Verified
Target buyer enterprise-epc; developer Verified developer Verified

Scroll the table sideways to see both products. The capability column stays in place.

Where they are the same 11 data points
  • Automatic module layout
  • Ground-mount / tracker layout
  • Remote site capture from imagery
  • Annual energy yield simulation
  • Bankable / IE-accepted simulation report
  • Public API
  • Geographic availability
  • Product status
  • Residential
  • Utility-scale
  • Web application

Which might suit you

Framed as requirements, not a verdict. Both descriptions come from the same data.

Consider RatedPower (pvDesign) if…

  • AI-assisted workflows matter to you
  • you work at utility scale

For developers, IPPs, EPCs and engineering firms who need to iterate hundreds of utility-scale layouts and carry them through to interconnection and off-taker-ready detailed engineering. Not for anyone who needs a published price (all three tiers are "Talk to sales"), not for rooftop or residential, and not for buyers who need site prospecting outside the specific geographies where Enverus PRISM International data is licensed.

Full RatedPower (pvDesign) profile

Consider Solargis Evaluate if…

  • you need a price you can plan against before talking to sales
  • you work at utility scale

For utility-scale developers, engineers and IEs who are already buying Solargis data and want the design and simulation layer on top of it, with reports investors accept. Not for residential or rooftop sales work, not for anyone needing CAD/construction deliverables, and not for small teams — the published entry subscription is €12,000 and the project allowance is 60 "Early Stage" projects.

Full Solargis Evaluate profile

Related comparisons

Other options in design & simulation

Frequently asked

What is the main difference between RatedPower (pvDesign) and Solargis Evaluate?

They differ most on price published. In total we recorded 22 verified differences and 11 points where they are the same.

Which costs more, RatedPower (pvDesign) or Solargis Evaluate?

RatedPower (pvDesign) is priced quote-only and Solargis Evaluate is priced per-seat. These are different pricing models, so a single side-by-side figure would be misleading. Each is shown as its vendor states it.

Is RatedPower (pvDesign) or Solargis Evaluate better?

We do not name a winner. Both are described from the same verified data, and which suits you depends on your requirements — the differences above are the facts; the choice is yours.

Last verified

Vendors change pricing and features without notice. Check the vendor’s own page before deciding.

This comparison is generated from the feature database, not written by hand. A pair is only published when the data holds at least five stateable differences — which is why 281 candidate pairs were refused. How comparisons are built