Easy PV
Midsummer
Design & simulation · Web
Comparison
18 differences · 14 identical
The differences that matter most
They differ most on free tier. PVsyst publishes CHF 700; Solargis Evaluate publishes EUR 12000.
We do not name a winner. Below are 18 differences drawn from the same sourced dataset that powers both product pages.
Verified against the vendor’s own pages.
Both use the same pricing model, so the figures below are directly comparable.
PVsyst
CHF 700
700 CHF per year
Per seat
Solargis Evaluate
EUR 12000
12000 EUR subscription
Per seat
60 projects
Prices are shown exactly as each vendor writes them and are never converted between currencies.
18 differences, ordered by how much they are likely to matter — pricing transparency first, then capabilities the vendor explicitly confirms or denies.
| Capability | PVsyst | Solargis Evaluate |
|---|---|---|
| Solar design & simulation | ||
| Battery sizing and modelling | Advanced Verified | — Not found |
| Loss and uncertainty modelling (P50/P90) | — Not found | Basic Verified |
| Bankable / IE-accepted simulation report | — Not found | Basic Vendor claim |
| CAD export (DXF/DWG) | Yes Vendor claim | — Not found |
| Inverter sizing | Advanced Verified | — Could not read |
| Proposals & sales | ||
| E-signature | — Could not read | — Not found |
| Estimation & financial modelling | ||
| ROI / payback calculation | Advanced Verified | — Not found |
| Integrations & extensibility | ||
| Named, documented integrations | 15 Verified | 0 Verified |
| Public API | Advanced Verified | Basic Vendor claim |
| Platform & deployment | ||
| Delivery model | software Verified | hybrid Verified |
| Desktop OS support | Windows 8/10/11 32/64-bit; NOT Citrix, Remote Desktop, Azure Virtual Desktop; workspace cannot sit on OneDrive/Google Drive/Dropbox Verified | — Could not read |
| Web application | No Verified | Yes Verified |
| Pricing & commercial terms | ||
| Free tier | free-trial Verified | Not offered Verified |
| Entry price | 700 CHF per year Verified | 12000 EUR subscription Verified |
| Currency | CHF Verified | EUR Verified |
| Project / design cap | — Could not read | 60 Verified |
| Market fit & availability | ||
| Residential | Yes Verified | No Verified |
| Target buyer | engineering-firm; small-installer Verified | developer Verified |
Scroll the table sideways to see both products. The capability column stays in place.
Framed as requirements, not a verdict. Both descriptions come from the same data.
For engineers and IEs who need a yield number a bank will accept and are willing to work in a single-machine desktop tool. Not for anyone who needs macOS, a browser, a shared cloud workspace, a terminal-server deployment, or a sales proposal — the vendor explicitly excludes servers, Citrix, Remote Desktop, Azure Virtual Desktop, Windows Enterprise editions and cloud-synced folders, and sells no CRM or proposal module at all.
Full PVsyst profileFor utility-scale developers, engineers and IEs who are already buying Solargis data and want the design and simulation layer on top of it, with reports investors accept. Not for residential or rooftop sales work, not for anyone needing CAD/construction deliverables, and not for small teams — the published entry subscription is €12,000 and the project allowance is 60 "Early Stage" projects.
Full Solargis Evaluate profileMidsummer
Design & simulation · Web
SolarEdge Technologies
Design & simulation · Web
National Laboratory of the Rockies (NLR) — formerly the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)
Design & simulation · Desktop
They differ most on free tier. In total we recorded 18 verified differences and 14 points where they are the same.
Both are priced per seat. PVsyst: CHF 700. Solargis Evaluate: EUR 12000.
We do not name a winner. Both are described from the same verified data, and which suits you depends on your requirements — the differences above are the facts; the choice is yours.
Last verified
Vendors change pricing and features without notice. Check the vendor’s own page before deciding.
This comparison is generated from the feature database, not written by hand. A pair is only published when the data holds at least five stateable differences — which is why 281 candidate pairs were refused. How comparisons are built