SolarSoftwares
Find Software →

100 products researched 2,422 sourced facts Verified September 2026 Methodology

Comparison

Easy PV vs PVsyst

30 differences · 9 identical

Easy PVMidsummer
Entry price
GBP 0
Charged
Per seat
Free tier or trial
Free tier, no time limit
Named integrations
3
Verified data points
10
PVsystPVsyst SA
Entry price
CHF 700
Charged
Per seat
Free tier or trial
Free trial
Named integrations
15
Verified data points
11

The differences that matter most

  • Free tier free-forever free-trial
  • Entry price 0 GBP free tier; Pro GBP 35/month 700 CHF per year
  • Ground-mount / tracker layout Not found Advanced

All 30 differences ↓

Easy PV or PVsyst?

They differ most on free tier. Easy PV publishes GBP 0; PVsyst publishes CHF 700.

We do not name a winner. Below are 30 differences drawn from the same sourced dataset that powers both product pages.

Verified against the vendor’s own pages.

Pricing

Both use the same pricing model, so the figures below are directly comparable.

Easy PV

GBP 0

0 GBP free tier; Pro GBP 35/month

Per seat

20 seats included

PVsyst

CHF 700

700 CHF per year

Per seat

Prices are shown exactly as each vendor writes them and are never converted between currencies.

Where they differ

30 differences, ordered by how much they are likely to matter — pricing transparency first, then capabilities the vendor explicitly confirms or denies.

Legend Verified Vendor claim Not offered Not found Could not read
Differences between Easy PV and PVsyst
Capability Easy PV PVsyst
Solar design & simulation
Ground-mount / tracker layout — Not found Advanced Verified
Loss and uncertainty modelling (P50/P90) Advanced Verified — Not found
Named weather / irradiance data source — Not found advanced Verified
Single-line diagram Advanced Verified — Not found
3D roof and obstruction model Advanced Verified — Could not read
Battery sizing and modelling Basic Verified Advanced Verified
CAD export (DXF/DWG) — Not found Yes Vendor claim
Inverter sizing — Could not read Advanced Verified
On-site capture (drone / photogrammetry) — Not found — Could not read
Remote site capture from imagery Basic Vendor claim Advanced Verified
Shading analysis — Could not read Advanced Verified
String sizing / stringing Advanced Verified — Could not read
Proposals & sales
Proposal document generation Advanced Verified — Could not read
Permitting & engineering
Interconnection application Advanced Verified — Could not read
Structural analysis Advanced Verified — Could not read
Reporting, data & BI
Report / deliverable export — Could not read Advanced Verified
AI & automation
AI design assistance not-claimed Not found — Could not read
Integrations & extensibility
Named, documented integrations 3 Verified 15 Verified
Public API Basic Vendor claim Advanced Verified
Platform & deployment
Delivery model hybrid Verified software Verified
Desktop OS support — Could not read Windows 8/10/11 32/64-bit; NOT Citrix, Remote Desktop, Azure Virtual Desktop; workspace cannot sit on OneDrive/Google Drive/Dropbox Verified
Web application Yes Verified No Verified
Pricing & commercial terms
Free tier free-forever Verified free-trial Verified
Entry price 0 GBP free tier; Pro GBP 35/month Verified 700 CHF per year Verified
Currency GBP Verified CHF Verified
Seat cap 20 Verified — Could not read
Market fit & availability
Geographic availability UK Verified global Verified
Jurisdictional compliance capability uk-mcs Verified — Could not read
Target buyer small-installer Verified engineering-firm; small-installer Verified
Utility-scale No Verified Yes Verified

Scroll the table sideways to see both products. The capability column stays in place.

Where they are the same 9 data points
  • Price published
  • Pricing model
  • Automatic module layout
  • Annual energy yield simulation
  • Bankable / IE-accepted simulation report
  • ROI / payback calculation
  • Product status
  • C&I
  • Residential

Which might suit you

Framed as requirements, not a verdict. Both descriptions come from the same data.

Consider Easy PV if…

  • you need a price you can plan against before talking to sales
  • you want to start without a budget approval
  • your work is mostly residential

UK residential and light-commercial installers who already buy from Midsummer, need MCS-compliant self-consumption modelling and structural/wind-loading numbers, and want DNO paperwork handled in the same place as the design. It is not for anyone outside the UK — MCS, DNO and the Midsummer trade account are the whole point — and the free tier's commercial logic should be read plainly: the software is free because the distributor is selling the hardware. [✓ https://easy-pv.co.uk/ · 2026-09-25]

Full Easy PV profile

Consider PVsyst if…

  • you need a price you can plan against before talking to sales
  • you need it to connect to tools you already run (15 named)
  • you are comfortable with desktop software and its constraints
  • you work at utility scale
  • your work is mostly residential

For engineers and IEs who need a yield number a bank will accept and are willing to work in a single-machine desktop tool. Not for anyone who needs macOS, a browser, a shared cloud workspace, a terminal-server deployment, or a sales proposal — the vendor explicitly excludes servers, Citrix, Remote Desktop, Azure Virtual Desktop, Windows Enterprise editions and cloud-synced folders, and sells no CRM or proposal module at all.

Full PVsyst profile

Related comparisons

Other options in design & simulation

Frequently asked

What is the main difference between Easy PV and PVsyst?

They differ most on free tier. In total we recorded 30 verified differences and 9 points where they are the same.

Which costs more, Easy PV or PVsyst?

Both are priced per seat. Easy PV: GBP 0. PVsyst: CHF 700.

Is Easy PV or PVsyst better?

We do not name a winner. Both are described from the same verified data, and which suits you depends on your requirements — the differences above are the facts; the choice is yours.

Last verified

Vendors change pricing and features without notice. Check the vendor’s own page before deciding.

This comparison is generated from the feature database, not written by hand. A pair is only published when the data holds at least five stateable differences — which is why 281 candidate pairs were refused. How comparisons are built