SolarSoftwares
Find Software →

100 products researched 2,422 sourced facts Verified September 2026 Methodology

Comparison

PlantPredict vs SolarEdge Designer

24 differences · 9 identical

PlantPredictTerabase Energy
Entry price
Could not verify
Charged
Not established
Free tier or trial
Not established
Named integrations
0
Verified data points
12
SolarEdge DesignerSolarEdge Technologies
Entry price
Free
Charged
Free
Free tier or trial
Free tier, no time limit
Named integrations
2
Verified data points
9

The differences that matter most

  • Price published Not established Published
  • Pricing model Not established free
  • Free tier Not established free-forever

All 24 differences ↓

PlantPredict or SolarEdge Designer?

They differ most on price published. PlantPredict publishes Could not verify; SolarEdge Designer publishes Free. They use different pricing models, so those figures do not compare directly.

We do not name a winner. Below are 24 differences drawn from the same sourced dataset that powers both product pages.

Verified against the vendor’s own pages.

Pricing

These cannot be compared on a single number

PlantPredict is priced on an unrecorded basis and SolarEdge Designer is priced free. These are different pricing models, so a single side-by-side figure would be misleading. Each is shown as its vendor states it.

PlantPredict

Could not verify

Model not established

SolarEdge Designer

Free

0 USD no licence or subscription fees

Free

Prices are shown exactly as each vendor writes them and are never converted between currencies.

Where they differ

24 differences, ordered by how much they are likely to matter — pricing transparency first, then capabilities the vendor explicitly confirms or denies.

Legend Verified Vendor claim Not offered Not found Could not read
Differences between PlantPredict and SolarEdge Designer
Capability PlantPredict SolarEdge Designer
Solar design & simulation
Bankable / IE-accepted simulation report Advanced Verified — Not found
Ground-mount / tracker layout Advanced Verified — Not found
Loss and uncertainty modelling (P50/P90) Advanced Verified — Not found
CAD export (DXF/DWG) Yes Vendor claim Yes Verified
Inverter sizing — Could not read Advanced Verified
Named weather / irradiance data source basic Vendor claim — Not found
String sizing / stringing Advanced Verified — Could not read
Proposals & sales
Proposal document generation — Could not read Advanced Verified
Reporting, data & BI
Report / deliverable export Advanced Verified — Could not read
AI & automation
AI agent / copilot Not offered Verified — Could not read
AI design assistance — Could not read vendor-claimed Verified
Integrations & extensibility
Public API Advanced Verified — Not found
MCP server — Verified — Could not read
Named, documented integrations — Could not read 2 Verified
Platform & deployment
Web application — Could not read Yes Verified
Pricing & commercial terms
Price published — Could not read Published Verified
Pricing model — Could not read free Verified
Free tier — Could not read free-forever Verified
Entry price — Could not read 0 USD no licence or subscription fees Verified
Currency — Could not read USD Verified
Market fit & availability
C&I No Verified Yes Verified
Geographic availability US; global Verified global Verified
Residential No Verified Yes Verified
Utility-scale Yes Verified No Verified

Scroll the table sideways to see both products. The capability column stays in place.

Where they are the same 9 data points
  • Automatic module layout
  • Single-line diagram
  • Shading analysis
  • Remote site capture from imagery
  • Battery sizing and modelling
  • Annual energy yield simulation
  • ROI / payback calculation
  • Product status
  • Delivery model

Which might suit you

Framed as requirements, not a verdict. Both descriptions come from the same data.

Consider PlantPredict if…

  • you work at utility scale

For utility-scale energy modellers and IEs who want a browser tool with unlimited projects, a documented algorithm set their lender's IE can audit, and automation. **Not for residential or C&I rooftop sales work, not for** teams that need layout-to-construction CAD (Design Pro is GIS-based, not an AutoCAD product), and not for anyone taking the site's structured data at face value — its schema publishes a price that its own pricing page contradicts.

Full PlantPredict profile

Consider SolarEdge Designer if…

  • you need a price you can plan against before talking to sales
  • you want to start without a budget approval
  • AI-assisted workflows matter to you
  • your work is mostly residential

For installers designing SolarEdge systems who want design, compliance checking and a proposal at no cost, integrated with the SolarEdge Monitoring Platform. Not for vendor-neutral design work: the vendor's own copy scopes it to "all your SolarEdge systems" and to compliance with "the latest SolarEdge design rules". Any comparison page must state that the price is zero because the product sells inverters, not software.

Full SolarEdge Designer profile

Related comparisons

Other options in design & simulation

Frequently asked

What is the main difference between PlantPredict and SolarEdge Designer?

They differ most on price published. In total we recorded 24 verified differences and 9 points where they are the same.

Which costs more, PlantPredict or SolarEdge Designer?

PlantPredict is priced on an unrecorded basis and SolarEdge Designer is priced free. These are different pricing models, so a single side-by-side figure would be misleading. Each is shown as its vendor states it.

Is PlantPredict or SolarEdge Designer better?

We do not name a winner. Both are described from the same verified data, and which suits you depends on your requirements — the differences above are the facts; the choice is yours.

Last verified

Vendors change pricing and features without notice. Check the vendor’s own page before deciding.

This comparison is generated from the feature database, not written by hand. A pair is only published when the data holds at least five stateable differences — which is why 281 candidate pairs were refused. How comparisons are built