SolarSoftwares
Find Software →

100 products researched 2,422 sourced facts Verified September 2026 Methodology

Comparison

HelioScope vs PlantPredict

27 differences · 13 identical

HelioScopeAurora Solar Inc. (acquired Folsom Labs, 2019)
Entry price
USD 159
Charged
Capacity tiered
Free tier or trial
Free trial
Named integrations
1
Verified data points
12
PlantPredictTerabase Energy
Entry price
Could not verify
Charged
Not established
Free tier or trial
Not established
Named integrations
0
Verified data points
12

The differences that matter most

  • Price published Partial Not established
  • Pricing model capacity-tiered Not established
  • Free tier free-trial Not established

All 27 differences ↓

HelioScope or PlantPredict?

They differ most on price published. HelioScope publishes USD 159; PlantPredict publishes Could not verify. They use different pricing models, so those figures do not compare directly.

We do not name a winner. Below are 27 differences drawn from the same sourced dataset that powers both product pages.

Verified against the vendor’s own pages.

Pricing

These cannot be compared on a single number

HelioScope is priced capacity-tiered and PlantPredict is priced on an unrecorded basis. These are different pricing models, so a single side-by-side figure would be misleading. Each is shown as its vendor states it.

HelioScope

USD 159

159 USD per licence/month

Capacity tiered

Size ceiling: 1.25 MW DC (Basic) / 5 MW (Pro) / 30 MW (Enterprise)

1 seat included

10 projects

PlantPredict

Could not verify

Model not established

Prices are shown exactly as each vendor writes them and are never converted between currencies.

Where they differ

27 differences, ordered by how much they are likely to matter — pricing transparency first, then capabilities the vendor explicitly confirms or denies.

Legend Verified Vendor claim Not offered Not found Could not read
Differences between HelioScope and PlantPredict
Capability HelioScope PlantPredict
Solar design & simulation
Single-line diagram Advanced Verified — Not found
Bankable / IE-accepted simulation report Basic Vendor claim Advanced Verified
CAD export (DXF/DWG) Yes Verified Yes Vendor claim
Export to other simulation tools none Verified — Could not read
Ground-mount / tracker layout Not offered Verified Advanced Verified
Inverter sizing Basic Vendor claim — Could not read
String sizing / stringing — Could not read Advanced Verified
Proposals & sales
E-signature — Verified — Could not read
Proposal document generation Advanced Verified — Could not read
Reporting, data & BI
Report / deliverable export — Could not read Advanced Verified
AI & automation
AI agent / copilot — Could not read Not offered Verified
AI defect / anomaly detection not-claimed Not found — Could not read
AI design assistance vendor-claimed Verified — Could not read
Integrations & extensibility
MCP server — Could not read — Verified
Named, documented integrations 1 Verified — Could not read
Platform & deployment
Web application Yes Verified — Could not read
Pricing & commercial terms
Price published Partial Verified — Could not read
Pricing model capacity-tiered Verified — Could not read
Free tier free-trial Verified — Could not read
Entry price 159 USD per licence/month Verified — Could not read
Currency USD Verified — Could not read
Project / design cap 10 Verified — Could not read
Seat cap 1 Verified — Could not read
System size cap 1.25 MW DC (Basic) / 5 MW (Pro) / 30 MW (Enterprise) Verified — Could not read
Market fit & availability
C&I Yes Verified No Verified
Target buyer small-installer; engineering-firm Verified — Could not read
Utility-scale No Verified Yes Verified

Scroll the table sideways to see both products. The capability column stays in place.

Where they are the same 13 data points
  • Automatic module layout
  • Shading analysis
  • Remote site capture from imagery
  • Battery sizing and modelling
  • Annual energy yield simulation
  • Loss and uncertainty modelling (P50/P90)
  • Named weather / irradiance data source
  • ROI / payback calculation
  • Public API
  • Geographic availability
  • Product status
  • Residential
  • Delivery model

Which might suit you

Framed as requirements, not a verdict. Both descriptions come from the same data.

Consider HelioScope if…

  • your systems fit within 1.25 MW DC (Basic) / 5 MW (Pro) / 30 MW (Enterprise)
  • AI-assisted workflows matter to you

For C&I designers and engineers who need a layout, a bankable-grade production estimate and a sales proposal without leaving one tool. Not for residential one-roof sales work (the same vendor routes that to Aurora) and not for jobs above 30 MW DC — the vendor publishes a hard design-size cap on every tier.

Full HelioScope profile

Consider PlantPredict if…

  • you work at utility scale

For utility-scale energy modellers and IEs who want a browser tool with unlimited projects, a documented algorithm set their lender's IE can audit, and automation. **Not for residential or C&I rooftop sales work, not for** teams that need layout-to-construction CAD (Design Pro is GIS-based, not an AutoCAD product), and not for anyone taking the site's structured data at face value — its schema publishes a price that its own pricing page contradicts.

Full PlantPredict profile

Related comparisons

Other options in design & simulation

Frequently asked

What is the main difference between HelioScope and PlantPredict?

They differ most on price published. In total we recorded 27 verified differences and 13 points where they are the same.

Which costs more, HelioScope or PlantPredict?

HelioScope is priced capacity-tiered and PlantPredict is priced on an unrecorded basis. These are different pricing models, so a single side-by-side figure would be misleading. Each is shown as its vendor states it.

Is HelioScope or PlantPredict better?

We do not name a winner. Both are described from the same verified data, and which suits you depends on your requirements — the differences above are the facts; the choice is yours.

Last verified

Vendors change pricing and features without notice. Check the vendor’s own page before deciding.

This comparison is generated from the feature database, not written by hand. A pair is only published when the data holds at least five stateable differences — which is why 281 candidate pairs were refused. How comparisons are built