SolarSoftwares
Find Software →

100 products researched 2,422 sourced facts Verified September 2026 Methodology

Comparison

Demand Manager (LightWork) vs Formbay

12 differences · 15 identical

Demand Manager (LightWork)Demand Manager
Entry price
Not publicly disclosed
Charged
Flat fee + success fee
Free tier or trial
Free tier, no time limit
Named integrations
0
Verified data points
9
FormbayFormbay Pty Ltd
Entry price
Not publicly disclosed
Charged
Quote only
Free tier or trial
No free tier or trial
Named integrations
1
Verified data points
8

The differences that matter most

  • Pricing model flat-plus-success-fee quote-only
  • Free tier free-forever Not offered
  • E-signature Not established Not established

All 12 differences ↓

Demand Manager (LightWork) or Formbay?

They differ most on pricing model. Demand Manager (LightWork) publishes Not publicly disclosed; Formbay publishes Not publicly disclosed. They use different pricing models, so those figures do not compare directly.

We do not name a winner. Below are 12 differences drawn from the same sourced dataset that powers both product pages.

Verified against the vendor’s own pages.

Pricing

These cannot be compared on a single number

Demand Manager (LightWork) is priced flat-plus-success-fee and Formbay is priced quote-only. These are different pricing models, so a single side-by-side figure would be misleading. Each is shown as its vendor states it.

Demand Manager (LightWork)

Not publicly disclosed

Flat fee + success fee

Formbay

Not publicly disclosed

Quote only

Prices are shown exactly as each vendor writes them and are never converted between currencies.

Where they differ

12 differences, ordered by how much they are likely to matter — pricing transparency first, then capabilities the vendor explicitly confirms or denies.

Legend Verified Vendor claim Not offered Not found Could not read
Differences between Demand Manager (LightWork) and Formbay
Capability Demand Manager (LightWork) Formbay
Proposals & sales
E-signature — Could not read — Verified
Incentive and rebate calculation Not offered Verified — Could not read
Estimation & financial modelling
Adders, discounts and margin — Not found — Could not read
Certificate, rebate & scheme administration
Duplicate / counterfeit serial detection Yes Vendor claim Yes Verified
AI & automation
AI compliance / document review — Could not read announced-not-shipped Verified
Integrations & extensibility
Named, documented integrations 0 Verified 1 Verified
Platform & deployment
Android app — Could not read Yes Verified
Delivery model service Verified software+service Verified
iOS app — Could not read Yes Verified
Pricing & commercial terms
Pricing model flat-plus-success-fee Verified quote-only Verified
Free tier free-forever Verified Not offered Verified
Market fit & availability
Target buyer small-installer Verified small-installer; mid-market Verified

Scroll the table sideways to see both products. The capability column stays in place.

Where they are the same 15 data points
  • Certificate creation and regulator submission
  • Multi-scheme coverage
  • Approved-product-list validation
  • On-site installation evidence capture
  • Certificate trading / monetisation
  • Payment to installer / retailer
  • Price published
  • Geographic availability
  • Jurisdictional compliance capability
  • Product status
  • C&I
  • Residential
  • Utility-scale
  • Web application
  • Proposal document generation

Which might suit you

Framed as requirements, not a verdict. Both descriptions come from the same data.

Consider Demand Manager (LightWork) if…

  • you want to start without a budget approval
  • your work is mostly residential

For Australian lighting retailers, electrical contractors, HVAC and hot-water installers and solar retailers who want compliance paperwork auto-filled, evidence captured on site, and a counterparty across five schemes in three states plus the federal RET. Not for anyone outside Australia; anyone who wants to know what the intermediary earns before signing; anyone on iOS (there is no iOS app); anyone whose primary need is residential solar at volume (LightWork Solar has 50+ Google Play downloads and was last updated in August 2024); and anyone who needs to be treated as a retail client, because the AFSL is authorised for wholesale clients only.

Full Demand Manager (LightWork) profile

Consider Formbay if…

  • your team works from phones in the field
  • AI-assisted workflows matter to you
  • your work is mostly residential

For Australian solar and battery retailers who create STCs, VEECs, PRCs, ESCs or LGCs at volume, and for the SAA-accredited installers and designers who capture evidence on their behalf. Not for anyone outside Australia (the platform is built around the CER's REC Registry and state scheme rules and has no non-Australian scheme support we could find), and not a CRM, proposal or design tool — its own terms restrict use of the Installer App to "collection and submission of STC application data or for internal Solar installation planning or project management."

Full Formbay profile

Frequently asked

What is the main difference between Demand Manager (LightWork) and Formbay?

They differ most on pricing model. In total we recorded 12 verified differences and 15 points where they are the same.

Which costs more, Demand Manager (LightWork) or Formbay?

Demand Manager (LightWork) is priced flat-plus-success-fee and Formbay is priced quote-only. These are different pricing models, so a single side-by-side figure would be misleading. Each is shown as its vendor states it.

Is Demand Manager (LightWork) or Formbay better?

We do not name a winner. Both are described from the same verified data, and which suits you depends on your requirements — the differences above are the facts; the choice is yours.

Last verified

Vendors change pricing and features without notice. Check the vendor’s own page before deciding.

This comparison is generated from the feature database, not written by hand. A pair is only published when the data holds at least five stateable differences — which is why 281 candidate pairs were refused. How comparisons are built