SolarSoftwares
Find Software →

100 products researched 2,422 sourced facts Verified September 2026 Methodology

Comparison

Arka 360 vs SolarEdge Designer

17 differences · 17 identical

Arka 360Arka360
Entry price
USD 159
Charged
Per seat
Free tier or trial
No free tier or trial
Named integrations
2
Verified data points
11
SolarEdge DesignerSolarEdge Technologies
Entry price
Free
Charged
Free
Free tier or trial
Free tier, no time limit
Named integrations
2
Verified data points
9

The differences that matter most

  • Pricing model per-seat free
  • Free tier Not offered free-forever
  • Entry price 159 USD per month (one of three conflicting figures) 0 USD no licence or subscription fees

All 17 differences ↓

Arka 360 or SolarEdge Designer?

They differ most on pricing model. Arka 360 publishes USD 159; SolarEdge Designer publishes Free. They use different pricing models, so those figures do not compare directly.

We do not name a winner. Below are 17 differences drawn from the same sourced dataset that powers both product pages.

Verified against the vendor’s own pages.

Pricing

These cannot be compared on a single number

Arka 360 is priced per-seat and SolarEdge Designer is priced free. These are different pricing models, so a single side-by-side figure would be misleading. Each is shown as its vendor states it.

Arka 360

USD 159

159 USD per month (one of three conflicting figures)

Per seat

1 seat included

SolarEdge Designer

Free

0 USD no licence or subscription fees

Free

Prices are shown exactly as each vendor writes them and are never converted between currencies.

Where they differ

17 differences, ordered by how much they are likely to matter — pricing transparency first, then capabilities the vendor explicitly confirms or denies.

Legend Verified Vendor claim Not offered Not found Could not read
Differences between Arka 360 and SolarEdge Designer
Capability Arka 360 SolarEdge Designer
Solar design & simulation
Loss and uncertainty modelling (P50/P90) Advanced Verified — Not found
Single-line diagram Advanced Verified — Not found
3D roof and obstruction model Advanced Verified — Could not read
Bankable / IE-accepted simulation report Basic Vendor claim — Not found
Ground-mount / tracker layout Basic Vendor claim — Not found
Inverter sizing — Could not read Advanced Verified
On-site capture (drone / photogrammetry) — Not found — Could not read
Shading analysis — Could not read Advanced Verified
String sizing / stringing Advanced Verified — Could not read
Integrations & extensibility
Public API Basic Vendor claim — Not found
Platform & deployment
Delivery model hybrid Verified software Verified
Pricing & commercial terms
Pricing model per-seat Verified free Verified
Free tier Not offered Verified free-forever Verified
Entry price 159 USD per month (one of three conflicting figures) Verified 0 USD no licence or subscription fees Verified
Seat cap 1 Verified — Could not read
Market fit & availability
Geographic availability US; IN; global Verified global Verified
Target buyer solo-installer; small-installer Verified — Could not read

Scroll the table sideways to see both products. The capability column stays in place.

Where they are the same 17 data points
  • AI design assistance
  • Currency
  • Price published
  • Automatic module layout
  • CAD export (DXF/DWG)
  • Remote site capture from imagery
  • Battery sizing and modelling
  • Annual energy yield simulation
  • Named weather / irradiance data source
  • ROI / payback calculation
  • Named, documented integrations
  • Product status
  • C&I
  • Residential
  • Utility-scale
  • Web application
  • Proposal document generation

Which might suit you

Framed as requirements, not a verdict. Both descriptions come from the same data.

Consider Arka 360 if…

  • you need a price you can plan against before talking to sales
  • AI-assisted workflows matter to you
  • your work is mostly residential

Residential and small-commercial installers who want design, shading, proposal and a light CRM in one subscription, and who are willing to buy permit plan sets from the same vendor. It is not for anyone who needs a dependable list price: the `/pricing` URL alone serves four incompatible price schedules in two currencies in a single page, and `/pricing-in` serves two different rupee schedules simultaneously. It is also not a utility-scale tool — there is no tracker or terrain workflow beyond a "single axis tracker" row in a feature table. [✓ https://arka360.com/pricing · 2026-09-25]

Full Arka 360 profile

Consider SolarEdge Designer if…

  • you need a price you can plan against before talking to sales
  • you want to start without a budget approval
  • AI-assisted workflows matter to you
  • your work is mostly residential

For installers designing SolarEdge systems who want design, compliance checking and a proposal at no cost, integrated with the SolarEdge Monitoring Platform. Not for vendor-neutral design work: the vendor's own copy scopes it to "all your SolarEdge systems" and to compliance with "the latest SolarEdge design rules". Any comparison page must state that the price is zero because the product sells inverters, not software.

Full SolarEdge Designer profile

Related comparisons

Other options in design & simulation

Frequently asked

What is the main difference between Arka 360 and SolarEdge Designer?

They differ most on pricing model. In total we recorded 17 verified differences and 17 points where they are the same.

Which costs more, Arka 360 or SolarEdge Designer?

Arka 360 is priced per-seat and SolarEdge Designer is priced free. These are different pricing models, so a single side-by-side figure would be misleading. Each is shown as its vendor states it.

Is Arka 360 or SolarEdge Designer better?

We do not name a winner. Both are described from the same verified data, and which suits you depends on your requirements — the differences above are the facts; the choice is yours.

Last verified

Vendors change pricing and features without notice. Check the vendor’s own page before deciding.

This comparison is generated from the feature database, not written by hand. A pair is only published when the data holds at least five stateable differences — which is why 281 candidate pairs were refused. How comparisons are built