Easy PV
Midsummer
Design & simulation · Web
Comparison
22 differences · 17 identical
The differences that matter most
They differ most on price published. Arka 360 publishes USD 159; HelioScope publishes USD 159. They use different pricing models, so those figures do not compare directly.
We do not name a winner. Below are 22 differences drawn from the same sourced dataset that powers both product pages.
Verified against the vendor’s own pages.
These cannot be compared on a single number
Arka 360 is priced per-seat and HelioScope is priced capacity-tiered. These are different pricing models, so a single side-by-side figure would be misleading. Each is shown as its vendor states it.
Arka 360
USD 159
159 USD per month (one of three conflicting figures)
Per seat
1 seat included
HelioScope
USD 159
159 USD per licence/month
Capacity tiered
Size ceiling: 1.25 MW DC (Basic) / 5 MW (Pro) / 30 MW (Enterprise)
1 seat included
10 projects
Prices are shown exactly as each vendor writes them and are never converted between currencies.
22 differences, ordered by how much they are likely to matter — pricing transparency first, then capabilities the vendor explicitly confirms or denies.
| Capability | Arka 360 | HelioScope |
|---|---|---|
| Solar design & simulation | ||
| 3D roof and obstruction model | Advanced Verified | — Could not read |
| Export to other simulation tools | — Could not read | none Verified |
| Ground-mount / tracker layout | Basic Vendor claim | Not offered Verified |
| Inverter sizing | — Could not read | Basic Vendor claim |
| Named weather / irradiance data source | — Not found | basic Vendor claim |
| On-site capture (drone / photogrammetry) | — Not found | — Could not read |
| Shading analysis | — Could not read | Advanced Verified |
| String sizing / stringing | Advanced Verified | — Could not read |
| Proposals & sales | ||
| E-signature | — Could not read | — Verified |
| AI & automation | ||
| AI defect / anomaly detection | — Could not read | not-claimed Not found |
| Integrations & extensibility | ||
| Named, documented integrations | 2 Verified | 1 Verified |
| Public API | Basic Vendor claim | Advanced Verified |
| Platform & deployment | ||
| Delivery model | hybrid Verified | software Verified |
| Pricing & commercial terms | ||
| Price published | Published Verified | Partial Verified |
| Pricing model | per-seat Verified | capacity-tiered Verified |
| Free tier | Not offered Verified | free-trial Verified |
| Entry price | 159 USD per month (one of three conflicting figures) Verified | 159 USD per licence/month Verified |
| Project / design cap | — Could not read | 10 Verified |
| System size cap | — Could not read | 1.25 MW DC (Basic) / 5 MW (Pro) / 30 MW (Enterprise) Verified |
| Market fit & availability | ||
| Geographic availability | US; IN; global Verified | US; global Verified |
| Residential | Yes Verified | No Verified |
| Target buyer | solo-installer; small-installer Verified | small-installer; engineering-firm Verified |
Scroll the table sideways to see both products. The capability column stays in place.
Framed as requirements, not a verdict. Both descriptions come from the same data.
Residential and small-commercial installers who want design, shading, proposal and a light CRM in one subscription, and who are willing to buy permit plan sets from the same vendor. It is not for anyone who needs a dependable list price: the `/pricing` URL alone serves four incompatible price schedules in two currencies in a single page, and `/pricing-in` serves two different rupee schedules simultaneously. It is also not a utility-scale tool — there is no tracker or terrain workflow beyond a "single axis tracker" row in a feature table. [✓ https://arka360.com/pricing · 2026-09-25]
Full Arka 360 profileFor C&I designers and engineers who need a layout, a bankable-grade production estimate and a sales proposal without leaving one tool. Not for residential one-roof sales work (the same vendor routes that to Aurora) and not for jobs above 30 MW DC — the vendor publishes a hard design-size cap on every tier.
Full HelioScope profileMidsummer
Design & simulation · Web
SolarEdge Technologies
Design & simulation · Web
National Laboratory of the Rockies (NLR) — formerly the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)
Design & simulation · Desktop
They differ most on price published. In total we recorded 22 verified differences and 17 points where they are the same.
Arka 360 is priced per-seat and HelioScope is priced capacity-tiered. These are different pricing models, so a single side-by-side figure would be misleading. Each is shown as its vendor states it.
We do not name a winner. Both are described from the same verified data, and which suits you depends on your requirements — the differences above are the facts; the choice is yours.
Last verified
Vendors change pricing and features without notice. Check the vendor’s own page before deciding.
This comparison is generated from the feature database, not written by hand. A pair is only published when the data holds at least five stateable differences — which is why 281 candidate pairs were refused. How comparisons are built