SolarSoftwares
Find Software →

100 products researched 2,422 sourced facts Verified September 2026 Methodology

Comparison

SAM (System Advisor Model) vs Solargis Evaluate

23 differences · 9 identical

SAM (System Advisor Model)National Laboratory of the Rockies (NLR) — formerly the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)
Entry price
Free
Charged
Free
Free tier or trial
Free tier, no time limit
Named integrations
0
Verified data points
6
Solargis EvaluateSolargis
Entry price
EUR 12000
Charged
Per seat
Free tier or trial
No free tier or trial
Named integrations
0
Verified data points
7

The differences that matter most

  • Pricing model free per-seat
  • Free tier free-forever Not offered
  • Entry price 0 USD free desktop application 12000 EUR subscription

All 23 differences ↓

SAM (System Advisor Model) or Solargis Evaluate?

They differ most on pricing model. SAM (System Advisor Model) publishes Free; Solargis Evaluate publishes EUR 12000. They use different pricing models, so those figures do not compare directly.

We do not name a winner. Below are 23 differences drawn from the same sourced dataset that powers both product pages.

Verified against the vendor’s own pages.

Pricing

These cannot be compared on a single number

SAM (System Advisor Model) is priced free and Solargis Evaluate is priced per-seat. These are different pricing models, so a single side-by-side figure would be misleading. Each is shown as its vendor states it.

SAM (System Advisor Model)

Free

0 USD free desktop application

Free

Solargis Evaluate

EUR 12000

12000 EUR subscription

Per seat

60 projects

Prices are shown exactly as each vendor writes them and are never converted between currencies.

Where they differ

23 differences, ordered by how much they are likely to matter — pricing transparency first, then capabilities the vendor explicitly confirms or denies.

Legend Verified Vendor claim Not offered Not found Could not read
Differences between SAM (System Advisor Model) and Solargis Evaluate
Capability SAM (System Advisor Model) Solargis Evaluate
Solar design & simulation
Automatic module layout — Not found Advanced Verified
Battery sizing and modelling Advanced Verified — Not found
Ground-mount / tracker layout — Not found Advanced Verified
Remote site capture from imagery — Not found Advanced Verified
Shading analysis — Not found Advanced Verified
Bankable / IE-accepted simulation report — Not found Basic Vendor claim
Inverter sizing Basic Vendor claim — Could not read
Loss and uncertainty modelling (P50/P90) Advanced Verified Basic Verified
Proposals & sales
E-signature — Could not read — Not found
Estimation & financial modelling
ROI / payback calculation Advanced Verified — Not found
Reporting, data & BI
Report / deliverable export — Not found Advanced Verified
Integrations & extensibility
Public API Advanced Verified Basic Vendor claim
Platform & deployment
Delivery model open-source Verified hybrid Verified
Desktop OS support not stated beyond 'desktop application' Verified — Could not read
Web application No Verified Yes Verified
Pricing & commercial terms
Pricing model free Verified per-seat Verified
Free tier free-forever Verified Not offered Verified
Entry price 0 USD free desktop application Verified 12000 EUR subscription Verified
Currency USD Verified EUR Verified
Project / design cap — Could not read 60 Verified
Market fit & availability
Geographic availability US; global Verified global Verified
Residential Yes Verified No Verified
Target buyer engineering-firm; developer Verified developer Verified

Scroll the table sideways to see both products. The capability column stays in place.

Where they are the same 9 data points
  • Price published
  • Single-line diagram
  • CAD export (DXF/DWG)
  • Annual energy yield simulation
  • Named weather / irradiance data source
  • Named, documented integrations
  • Product status
  • C&I
  • Utility-scale

Which might suit you

Framed as requirements, not a verdict. Both descriptions come from the same data.

Consider SAM (System Advisor Model) if…

  • you need a price you can plan against before talking to sales
  • you want to start without a budget approval
  • you are comfortable with desktop software and its constraints
  • you work at utility scale
  • your work is mostly residential

For analysts, researchers, policy people and developers who need a transparent, auditable, free model and a real financial structure behind the kWh. Not for installers who need a roof capture, a proposal or a plan set — SAM has no satellite imagery workflow, no proposal output and no CRM, and it registers users with a free software key rather than selling a licence.

Full SAM (System Advisor Model) profile

Consider Solargis Evaluate if…

  • you need a price you can plan against before talking to sales
  • you work at utility scale

For utility-scale developers, engineers and IEs who are already buying Solargis data and want the design and simulation layer on top of it, with reports investors accept. Not for residential or rooftop sales work, not for anyone needing CAD/construction deliverables, and not for small teams — the published entry subscription is €12,000 and the project allowance is 60 "Early Stage" projects.

Full Solargis Evaluate profile

Related comparisons

Other options in design & simulation

Frequently asked

What is the main difference between SAM (System Advisor Model) and Solargis Evaluate?

They differ most on pricing model. In total we recorded 23 verified differences and 9 points where they are the same.

Which costs more, SAM (System Advisor Model) or Solargis Evaluate?

SAM (System Advisor Model) is priced free and Solargis Evaluate is priced per-seat. These are different pricing models, so a single side-by-side figure would be misleading. Each is shown as its vendor states it.

Is SAM (System Advisor Model) or Solargis Evaluate better?

We do not name a winner. Both are described from the same verified data, and which suits you depends on your requirements — the differences above are the facts; the choice is yours.

Last verified

Vendors change pricing and features without notice. Check the vendor’s own page before deciding.

This comparison is generated from the feature database, not written by hand. A pair is only published when the data holds at least five stateable differences — which is why 281 candidate pairs were refused. How comparisons are built