SolarSoftwares
Find Software →

100 products researched 2,422 sourced facts Verified September 2026 Methodology

Comparison

PlantPredict vs SAM (System Advisor Model)

24 differences · 9 identical

PlantPredictTerabase Energy
Entry price
Could not verify
Charged
Not established
Free tier or trial
Not established
Named integrations
0
Verified data points
12
SAM (System Advisor Model)National Laboratory of the Rockies (NLR) — formerly the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)
Entry price
Free
Charged
Free
Free tier or trial
Free tier, no time limit
Named integrations
0
Verified data points
6

The differences that matter most

  • Price published Not established Published
  • Pricing model Not established free
  • Free tier Not established free-forever

All 24 differences ↓

PlantPredict or SAM (System Advisor Model)?

They differ most on price published. PlantPredict publishes Could not verify; SAM (System Advisor Model) publishes Free. They use different pricing models, so those figures do not compare directly.

We do not name a winner. Below are 24 differences drawn from the same sourced dataset that powers both product pages.

Verified against the vendor’s own pages.

Pricing

These cannot be compared on a single number

PlantPredict is priced on an unrecorded basis and SAM (System Advisor Model) is priced free. These are different pricing models, so a single side-by-side figure would be misleading. Each is shown as its vendor states it.

PlantPredict

Could not verify

Model not established

SAM (System Advisor Model)

Free

0 USD free desktop application

Free

Prices are shown exactly as each vendor writes them and are never converted between currencies.

Where they differ

24 differences, ordered by how much they are likely to matter — pricing transparency first, then capabilities the vendor explicitly confirms or denies.

Legend Verified Vendor claim Not offered Not found Could not read
Differences between PlantPredict and SAM (System Advisor Model)
Capability PlantPredict SAM (System Advisor Model)
Solar design & simulation
Automatic module layout Advanced Verified — Not found
Bankable / IE-accepted simulation report Advanced Verified — Not found
Ground-mount / tracker layout Advanced Verified — Not found
Remote site capture from imagery Advanced Verified — Not found
Shading analysis Advanced Verified — Not found
CAD export (DXF/DWG) Yes Vendor claim — Not found
Inverter sizing — Could not read Basic Vendor claim
Named weather / irradiance data source basic Vendor claim advanced Verified
String sizing / stringing Advanced Verified — Could not read
Reporting, data & BI
Report / deliverable export Advanced Verified — Not found
AI & automation
AI agent / copilot Not offered Verified — Could not read
Integrations & extensibility
MCP server — Verified — Could not read
Named, documented integrations — Could not read 0 Verified
Platform & deployment
Delivery model software Verified open-source Verified
Desktop OS support — Could not read not stated beyond 'desktop application' Verified
Web application — Could not read No Verified
Pricing & commercial terms
Price published — Could not read Published Verified
Pricing model — Could not read free Verified
Free tier — Could not read free-forever Verified
Entry price — Could not read 0 USD free desktop application Verified
Currency — Could not read USD Verified
Market fit & availability
C&I No Verified Yes Verified
Residential No Verified Yes Verified
Target buyer — Could not read engineering-firm; developer Verified

Scroll the table sideways to see both products. The capability column stays in place.

Where they are the same 9 data points
  • Single-line diagram
  • Battery sizing and modelling
  • Annual energy yield simulation
  • Loss and uncertainty modelling (P50/P90)
  • ROI / payback calculation
  • Public API
  • Geographic availability
  • Product status
  • Utility-scale

Which might suit you

Framed as requirements, not a verdict. Both descriptions come from the same data.

Consider PlantPredict if…

  • you work at utility scale

For utility-scale energy modellers and IEs who want a browser tool with unlimited projects, a documented algorithm set their lender's IE can audit, and automation. **Not for residential or C&I rooftop sales work, not for** teams that need layout-to-construction CAD (Design Pro is GIS-based, not an AutoCAD product), and not for anyone taking the site's structured data at face value — its schema publishes a price that its own pricing page contradicts.

Full PlantPredict profile

Consider SAM (System Advisor Model) if…

  • you need a price you can plan against before talking to sales
  • you want to start without a budget approval
  • you are comfortable with desktop software and its constraints
  • you work at utility scale
  • your work is mostly residential

For analysts, researchers, policy people and developers who need a transparent, auditable, free model and a real financial structure behind the kWh. Not for installers who need a roof capture, a proposal or a plan set — SAM has no satellite imagery workflow, no proposal output and no CRM, and it registers users with a free software key rather than selling a licence.

Full SAM (System Advisor Model) profile

Related comparisons

Other options in design & simulation

Frequently asked

What is the main difference between PlantPredict and SAM (System Advisor Model)?

They differ most on price published. In total we recorded 24 verified differences and 9 points where they are the same.

Which costs more, PlantPredict or SAM (System Advisor Model)?

PlantPredict is priced on an unrecorded basis and SAM (System Advisor Model) is priced free. These are different pricing models, so a single side-by-side figure would be misleading. Each is shown as its vendor states it.

Is PlantPredict or SAM (System Advisor Model) better?

We do not name a winner. Both are described from the same verified data, and which suits you depends on your requirements — the differences above are the facts; the choice is yours.

Last verified

Vendors change pricing and features without notice. Check the vendor’s own page before deciding.

This comparison is generated from the feature database, not written by hand. A pair is only published when the data holds at least five stateable differences — which is why 281 candidate pairs were refused. How comparisons are built